Flowers v. Shaw et al
Filing
40
ORDER ADOPTING 39 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court GRANTS Defendant Brooks' and Defendant Lane's and Pruitt's unopposed Motions for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES Plaintiff 39;s claims against Defendants Brooks, Lane, and Pruitt. In addition, the Court DISMISSES, without prejudice, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Chitty and McCullough. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint and DIRECTS the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. The Court DENIES Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 5/17/2016. (ca)
1n the initeb tate 1Ditrftt Court
for the boutbern aitrict of deorgia
13runtuitk Dibiion
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ANTHONY FLOWERS,
Plaintiff,
V.
LT. MIKE LANE; SGT. JONATHAN
MCCULLOUGH; SHAE PHILLIPS
PRUITF; TY BROOKS; and WILLIAM
CHITTY,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:14-cv-138
ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the entire
record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation, dkt. no. 39, to which Plaintiff failed to file
Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court.
The Court GRANTS Defendant Brooks' and Defendants Lane's
and Pruitt's unopposed Motions for Summary Judgment and
DISMISSES
Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Brooks, Lane,
and Pruitt. In addition, the Court
DISMISSES,
without
prejudice, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Chitty and
McCullough.
DIRECTS
AO 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
The Court
DISMISSES
Plaintiff's Complaint and
the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of
dismissal and to CLOSE this case. The Court DENIES Plaintiff
leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.
SO ORDERED, this
1
7
ay_,รง
EY WOOD, CHIEF JUDGE
TATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AO 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
2
, 2016.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?