Flowers v. Shaw et al

Filing 40

ORDER ADOPTING 39 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court GRANTS Defendant Brooks' and Defendant Lane's and Pruitt's unopposed Motions for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES Plaintiff� 39;s claims against Defendants Brooks, Lane, and Pruitt. In addition, the Court DISMISSES, without prejudice, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Chitty and McCullough. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint and DIRECTS the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. The Court DENIES Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 5/17/2016. (ca)

Download PDF
1n the initeb tate 1Ditrftt Court for the boutbern aitrict of deorgia 13runtuitk Dibiion * * * * * * * * * * * * ANTHONY FLOWERS, Plaintiff, V. LT. MIKE LANE; SGT. JONATHAN MCCULLOUGH; SHAE PHILLIPS PRUITF; TY BROOKS; and WILLIAM CHITTY, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:14-cv-138 ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 39, to which Plaintiff failed to file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court GRANTS Defendant Brooks' and Defendants Lane's and Pruitt's unopposed Motions for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Brooks, Lane, and Pruitt. In addition, the Court DISMISSES, without prejudice, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Chitty and McCullough. DIRECTS AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint and the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. The Court DENIES Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. SO ORDERED, this 1 7 ay_,รง EY WOOD, CHIEF JUDGE TATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) 2 , 2016.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?