Stevens v. United States et al

Filing 66

ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 61 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court and OVERRULES Plaintiff's Objections. The Court GRANTS Defendants' 39 Motion to Dismiss, DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint, and DISMISSES as moot Defendants' 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court also DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case and DENIES Plaintiff in forma pauperis status on appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 3/28/2017. (csr)

Download PDF
Mmteb ^tates( Btsitrtct Conrt Jfor t^t ^ontliient Bisstrtct ot <§eorgta PtttnsitDttk litiitsiton RAYFORD STEVENS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:14-cv-178 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DR. PETER LIBERO; PA B. AREMU; and MRS. MOON, Defendants. ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 10, 2017, dkt. no. to which Plaintiff filed Objections, dkt. no. 65. 61, Plaintiff's Objections are little more than an iteration of assertions he has made on previous occasions, including in his Response to Defendants' Dkt. Motion to Dismiss. No. 42. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court and OVERRULES Plaintiff's Objections. The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint, and DISMISSES as moot Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) The Court also DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case and DENIES Plaintiff in forma pauperis status on appeal. SO ORDERED, this day of /I G0t>BEY WOOD, CHIEF JUDGE united' states district court SOUTHERN district OF GEORGIA A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) t 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?