Smith et al v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association et al

Filing 61

ORDER denying as moot 47 Motion to Remand; denying as moot 50 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 7/7/2017. (ca)

Download PDF
In ?l^nitetii ^totesi Btsstntt Court tor tl^e ^ontl^em Btotrtct ot ^eorstn PmnotDult IBiOtOton MARVIN B. SMITH, III & SHARON H. SMITH, Plaintiffs, No. 2:15-CV-70 V. HSBC BANK USA, N.A.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; S. ANDREW SHUPING, JR.; SHUPING, MORSE & ROSS LLP; RUBIN LUBLIN, LOG; BRET CHANESS; and PETER LUBLIN; Defendants. ORDER On March 22, 2017, Plaintiffs moved the Court to remand this case under the abstention doctrine set out in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). based on the fact that a Dkt. No. 47. state proceeding Their motion was that Plaintiffs alleged to be parallel was pending before the Georgia Supreme Court. Id. at 7 (referencing case Court denied Plaintiffs' petition for June 30, 2017. Petitions, 2017-denied/ A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) number S17C1005). That writ of certiorari on See Sup. Ct. of Ga., 2017 Denied Certiorari http://www.gasupreme.us/granted-denied-petitions/ (last accessed July 6, 2017). Therefore, Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand under the Younger Abstention Doctrine, dkt. no. 47, is DENIED as moot. On April 3, 2017, Plaintiffs moved the Court to stay its ruling on resolved Defendants' their Younger motion remand to dismiss motion. Dkt. until No. after 50. it That motion is likewise DENIED as moot. At the same time. Plaintiffs moved the Court to allow them another opportunity to amend their complaint in the event the Court would otherwise dismiss their case. 3-5. Dkt. No. 51 at The Court will take that request under consideration when it decides the motions to dismiss. The Clerk of Court is therefore DIRECTED to terminate the motion. SO ORDERED, this 7th day of July, 2017. HONT LISA GODBE«Y WOOD, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?