Medlin v. Burns

Filing 33

ORDER granting parties consent 32 Motion to Strike and Motion for Protective Order re 30 , Plaintiff shall file an (i) amended Jeff Heinrichs' affidavit removing Paragraphs 67, 68, 69, & 77, and (ii) amend Supplementary Briefing removing ref erences to Paragraphs 67, 68, 69, & 77 and any argument related to Paragraphs 67, 68, 69, & 77, Paragraphs 67, 68, 69, & 77; and any arguments related to Paragraphs 67, 68, 69 & 77 shall not be considered on any matter in this action. The Clerk shall seal Document 30 and Mr. Heinrichs' Affidavit filed therewith. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 3/14/2016. (ca)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION ALBERT V. MEDLIN, ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. Civil Action No.: 2:15-cv-00078 ) ) WALTER BURNS AND SCOTT DONOVAN) ) Defendant. ) ORDER On March 7, 2016, the Parties filed a Consent Motion for a Protective Order and to Strike Paragraphs 67, 68, 69, & 77 of Jeff Heirtrichs' affidavit and any argument in Document 30 related to Paragraphs 67, 68, 69, & 77, For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall not disclose what the United States claims to be privileged communications and documents obtained during discussions with or provided to him by Mr. Heinrichs; the Clerk shall seal Document 30 and Mr. Heinrichs' Affidavit filed therewith; Paragraphs 67, 68, 69, & 77 of Mr. Heinrichs' affidavit shall be stricken; Plaintiff shall file an (i) amended Jeff Heinrichs' affidavit removing Paragraphs 67, 68, 69, & 77, and (ii) amended Supplementary Briefing removing references to Paragraphs 67, 68, 69, & 77 and any argument related to Paragraphs 67, 68, 69, & 77, Paragraphs 67, 68, 69, & 77; 4zfd any argument related to Paragraphs 67, 68, 69, & 77 shall not be considered onwnw matt7ln th,4ction. SO ORDERED, this '\day ofMarc ,2016. ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?