Holmes v. Flournoy

Filing 28

ORDER ADOPTING 26 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DIMISSES in part and DENIES in part Holmes' Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/28/2017. (ca)

Download PDF
Sn {[Kntteb States! Btsitrtct Court :lfor ^out][ient Btotnct ot (f^eorstu Prunototck litbtoton JAMES COURY HOLMES, Petitioner, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:15-cv-l 12 V. JOHN V.FLOURNOY, Respondent. ORDER Presently before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's August 8, 2017, Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 26, to which Petitioner James Coury Holmes {^''Holmes") filed an Objection, dkt. no. 27. Holmes' Objection reiterates an argument presented in his Petition. Specifically, Holmes argues that the sentencing court failed to order that his restitution was due '"immediately" during his sentencing. As a result. Holmes contends the sentencing court improperly delegated its authority to determine his restitution payment schedule to the Bureau of Prisons. As the Magistrate Judge correctly concluded in the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner may not pursue such a A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) claim via Section 2241, as it concerns the validity of his sentence. Therefore, after an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the Court CONCURS with the Magistrate Judge, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court, and OVERRULES Holmes' Objection. Consequently, the Court DISMISSES in part and DENIES in part Holmes' Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C, ยง 2241. Additionally, the Court DENIES Holmes leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and tg CLOSE this case. SO ORDERED, this , 2017. day of . LISA GODBEY WOOD, JUDGE TED /STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?