Hope v. United States Of America
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's #10 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court and OVERRULES Hope's Objections. The Court DENIES Hope's #1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct her Sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. The Court also DENIES Hope a Certificate of Appealability and in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter an appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 1/10/2017. (csr)
?imteb States; IBtsitrtct Court
:iror tfie ^otttlient IBtsftrtct of Georgia
^runsitDtcb Idtbtsfton
SCHELLA HOPE,
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:15-cv-169
Petitioner,
V.
(Case No.: 2:13-cr-16)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the entire
record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's
Report and Recommendation dated November 14, 2016,
(dkt. no.
10), to which Schella Hope ('"Hope") filed Objections,
11).
(dkt. no.
Hope's Objections are nothing more than her disagreement
with the Magistrate Judge's analyses and conclusions regarding
Hope's ineffective assistance of counsel claims set forth in her
original pleadings.
Accordingly,
Hope's Objections are without merit.
the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report
and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court and OVERRULES
Hope's Objections.
The Court DENIES Hope's Motion to Vacate,
Set Aside, or Correct her Sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
ยง 2255.
AO 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
(Dkt. No. 1.)
The Court also DENIES Hope a Certificate
of Appealability and in forma pauperis status on appeal.
The
Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter an appropriate
judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case.
SO ORDERED, this
/^
day of
WOOD,
/ 2017
CHIEF JUDGE
UN^ED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SmJTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AO 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?