Hope v. United States Of America

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 10 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court and OVERRULES Hope's Objections. The Court DENIES Hope's 1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct her Sentence filed pursuant to 28 U .S.C. § 2255. The Court also DENIES Hope a Certificate of Appealability and in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter an appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 1/10/2017. (csr)

Download PDF
?imteb States; IBtsitrtct Court :iror tfie ^otttlient IBtsftrtct of Georgia ^runsitDtcb Idtbtsfton SCHELLA HOPE, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:15-cv-169 Petitioner, V. (Case No.: 2:13-cr-16) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 14, 2016, (dkt. no. 10), to which Schella Hope ('"Hope") filed Objections, 11). (dkt. no. Hope's Objections are nothing more than her disagreement with the Magistrate Judge's analyses and conclusions regarding Hope's ineffective assistance of counsel claims set forth in her original pleadings. Accordingly, Hope's Objections are without merit. the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court and OVERRULES Hope's Objections. The Court DENIES Hope's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct her Sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255. AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) (Dkt. No. 1.) The Court also DENIES Hope a Certificate of Appealability and in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter an appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. SO ORDERED, this /^ day of WOOD, / 2017 CHIEF JUDGE UN^ED STATES DISTRICT COURT SmJTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AO 72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?