Williams v. Flournoy
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court, and OVERRULES Williams' Objections. The Court DISMISSES Williams' Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 224 1. The Court DENIES Williams' Motion to Supplement. Dkt. No. 7. The Court DENIES Williams leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 6/17/2016. (ca) Modified on 6/17/2016 (ca).
in the iuiteb 'tate Ditritt Court
for the boutbern 1Ditrid of atorsta
1kuntuitk 38ibioton
FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS,
Petitioner,
V.
J.V. FLOURNOY,
Respondent.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:16-cv48
ORDER
Presently before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's May
16, 2016, Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 5, to which
Petitioner Franklin Williams ("Williams") has filed Objections,
dkt. no. 6. After an independent and de novo review of the
entire record, the Court CONCURS with the Magistrate Judge,
ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the
Court, and OVERRULES Williams' Objections. Consequently, the
Court DISMISSES Williams' Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,
filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241. The Court DENIES Williams'
Motion to Supplement. Dkt. No. 7. Additionally, the Court
DENIES Williams leave to appeal in forma pauperis.
AO 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
The Clerk of
Court is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal
and to CLOSE this case.
SO ORDERED, this
day of
q
AO 72A
(Rev. 8/2
~
L
1
2016.
ODBEY WOOD, CHIEF JUDGE
ITFD STATES DISTRICT COURT
UHER1 DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SA
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?