Nance v. United States Of America
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 13 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DENIES Nance's 1 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence and DISMISSES as moot his 6 Motio n for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. The Court DENIES Nance a Certificate of Appealability and in forma pauperis status on appeal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 11/9/2017. (csr)
lin
tEniteli States; Bis^trict Court
:lfor t|ie ^ontliem Bisitrtct ot <@eorsta
pntnieftDte]^ IBtlitsiton
MELVIN NANCE,
Movant,
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:16-cv-77
V.
(Case No.: 2:14-cr-6)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the entire
record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation,
C'Nance")
dkt.
no.
13,
to which Movant Melvin Nance
filed Objections, dkt. no.
15.
In his Objections,
Nance merely reiterates the assertions made in his original
Motion and his dissatisfaction with the Magistrate Judge's
Report and Recommendation.
The Magistrate Judge correctly
rejected Nance's arguments.
Thus, the Court OVERRULES Nance's Objections and ADOPTS the
Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of
the Court.
Vacate,
The Court DENIES Nance's 28 U.S.C.
ยง
2255 Motion to
Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence, dkt. no. 1, and
DISMISSES as moot: his Motion for Summary Judgment, dkt. no.
A0 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
6.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and to
enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal.
The Court DENIES
Nance a Certificate of Appealability and in forma pauperis
status on appeal.
SO ORDERED, this
^
^
. 2017
/OOD,
JUDGE
rATEnDISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT
A0 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?