Nance v. United States Of America

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 13 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DENIES Nance's 1 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence and DISMISSES as moot his 6 Motio n for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. The Court DENIES Nance a Certificate of Appealability and in forma pauperis status on appeal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 11/9/2017. (csr)

Download PDF
lin tEniteli States; Bis^trict Court :lfor t|ie ^ontliem Bisitrtct ot <@eorsta pntnieftDte]^ IBtlitsiton MELVIN NANCE, Movant, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:16-cv-77 V. (Case No.: 2:14-cr-6) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, C'Nance") dkt. no. 13, to which Movant Melvin Nance filed Objections, dkt. no. 15. In his Objections, Nance merely reiterates the assertions made in his original Motion and his dissatisfaction with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge correctly rejected Nance's arguments. Thus, the Court OVERRULES Nance's Objections and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. Vacate, The Court DENIES Nance's 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence, dkt. no. 1, and DISMISSES as moot: his Motion for Summary Judgment, dkt. no. A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) 6. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. The Court DENIES Nance a Certificate of Appealability and in forma pauperis status on appeal. SO ORDERED, this ^ ^ . 2017 /OOD, JUDGE rATEnDISTRICT COURT DISTRICT A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?