Williams v. Flournoy

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Williams' Petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and DIRECTS the Clerk to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. The Court DENIES Williams in forma pauperis status on appeal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 11/9/2017. (ca)

Download PDF
Sn t(ie t[lntteti States; BtfiStrict Court :lfor tlie ^ontliem Btfi^trttt ot ({leorsta Prttnolotck Btiitiefion FRANKLIN L, WILLIAMS, Petitioner, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:17-cv-80 V. J.V. FLOURNOY, Warden, Respondent. ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 8, to which Petitioner Franklin Williams (^"Williams") filed Objections, dkt. no. 9. In his Objections, Williams contends he set forth a new claim in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition—his right to have counsel of his own choosing—which allows him to use the saving clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e) to proceed with his Section 2241 Petition. Even if this were a new claim, Williams cannot proceed with his Petition via the saving clause. Put succinctly. Section 2241 is the proper avenue for post-conviction relief in limited circumstances, such as when the remedy afforded by 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is ^'inadequate or ineffective". 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e). Section 2241 cannot be used, however, if the petitioner could have raised a claim in a Section 2255 motion. McCarthan v. Dir of Goodwill Indus.-Suncoast, Inc., 851 F.3d 1076 (11th Cir. 2017). To the extent Williams asserts he raised a "new" claim with his latest Section 2241 Petition, such an attempt fails. Williams has filed numerous post-conviction motions and petitions in this Court, and his failure to raise any new claim until now does not render Section 2255's remedy "ineffective or inadequate". The Court OVERRULES Williams' Objections and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Williams' Petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. The Court DENIES Williams in forma pauperis status on appeal. SO ORDERED, this I-0^ GODBEY WOOD, JUDGE [SIITEl/ STATES DISTRICT COURT RN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA , 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?