Worthy v. Selph et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims under the ADEA, ADA, and GINA, as well as all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Selph and Block for failure to state a claim. However, Plaintiff's claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against Defendant Woody Folsom Automotives remain pending before the Court. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/3/2018. (ca)

Download PDF
?Hnttett States: Bisitrict Court Jfor t|ie ^otttl^eni liisitrtct ot(@eorsta Pruns(b)tck Btbtoton ANTHONY G. WORTHY, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:18-cv-51 V. DYLAN SELPH; MIKE BLOCK;and WOODY FOLSOM AUTOMOTIVES, Defendants. ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's July 9, 2018 Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 5, to which Plaintiff did not file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims under the ADEA, ADA, and GINA, as well as all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Selph and Block for failure to state a claim. However, Plaintiff's claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against Defendant Woody Folsom Automotives remain A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) pending before the Court. SO ORDERED, this day of HO^ LISA GODBEY WOOD, JUDGE ITTED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) , 2018

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?