Barfield v. Geter
Filing
9
ORDER VACATING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Christopher Barfield. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 9/9/2020. (ca)
Case 2:20-cv-00062-LGW-BWC Document 9 Filed 09/09/20 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
BRUNSWICK DIVISION
FILED
John E. Triplett, Acting Clerk
United States District Court
By casbell at 8:44 am, Sep 09, 2020
CHRISTOPHER BARFIELD,
Petitioner,
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:20-cv-62
v.
LINDA GETER,
Respondent.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Christopher Barfield’s (“Barfield”) payment
of the requisite filing fee after I issued a Report recommending dismissal of Barfield’s 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 Petition for failure to follow this Court’s Orders, docs. 4, 6. Doc. 7. Thus, the Court
VACATES the August 24, 2020 Report and Recommendation.
However, the Court notes this Report and Recommendation was returned as
undeliverable with the notations: “Return to Sender, Refused, Unable to Forward.” Doc. 8. The
Court reminds Barfield of his responsibility to notify the Court, in writing, of any change in
address. Local R. 11.1. If this Court’s most recent mailing was returned as a result of Barfield’s
transfer to another facility and he failed to notify the Court of his change in address, as required,
the Court will dismiss his Petition for failing to follow a Local Rule of this Court. Barfield shall
have 14 days to notify the Court of any change in his address or otherwise respond to this Order.
If Barfield fails to do so, the Court will also dismiss his Petition without prejudice for failing to
Case 2:20-cv-00062-LGW-BWC Document 9 Filed 09/09/20 Page 2 of 2
follow an Order of this Court.
SO ORDERED, this 9th day of September, 2020.
_____________________________________
BENJAMIN W. CHEESBRO
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?