Barfield v. Geter

Filing 9

ORDER VACATING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Christopher Barfield. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 9/9/2020. (ca)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-00062-LGW-BWC Document 9 Filed 09/09/20 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION FILED John E. Triplett, Acting Clerk United States District Court By casbell at 8:44 am, Sep 09, 2020 CHRISTOPHER BARFIELD, Petitioner, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:20-cv-62 v. LINDA GETER, Respondent. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Christopher Barfield’s (“Barfield”) payment of the requisite filing fee after I issued a Report recommending dismissal of Barfield’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for failure to follow this Court’s Orders, docs. 4, 6. Doc. 7. Thus, the Court VACATES the August 24, 2020 Report and Recommendation. However, the Court notes this Report and Recommendation was returned as undeliverable with the notations: “Return to Sender, Refused, Unable to Forward.” Doc. 8. The Court reminds Barfield of his responsibility to notify the Court, in writing, of any change in address. Local R. 11.1. If this Court’s most recent mailing was returned as a result of Barfield’s transfer to another facility and he failed to notify the Court of his change in address, as required, the Court will dismiss his Petition for failing to follow a Local Rule of this Court. Barfield shall have 14 days to notify the Court of any change in his address or otherwise respond to this Order. If Barfield fails to do so, the Court will also dismiss his Petition without prejudice for failing to Case 2:20-cv-00062-LGW-BWC Document 9 Filed 09/09/20 Page 2 of 2 follow an Order of this Court. SO ORDERED, this 9th day of September, 2020. _____________________________________ BENJAMIN W. CHEESBRO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?