DiVito v. Lappin et al

Filing 22

ORDER finding as moot 12 Motion ; adopting the 14 Report and Recommendations, dismissing Harvey Lappin as an impropery party Respondent, denying the peition, closing this civil aciton, and directing that a final judgment be entered in favor of Respondent Wells. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 09/08/09. (thb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION MICHAEL DIIVITO, Petitioner, V. ZO USSEP - 8 PM 1 : 2 14 CV 308-087 WALT WELLS, Warden, et al., Respondents. ORDER After a carefull, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Petitioner's pending requests to supplement his petition with additional authority and for a "case status report" are MOOT (doc. nos. 11-1, 12), Harvey Lappin is DISMISSED as an improper party Respondent, the petition is DENIED, this civil action is CLOSED, and a final judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of Respondent Wells. SO ORDERED thisofSept nhr (ThQ -At Aiicnietn UNITED STA DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?