Dunn v. Corrections Corporation of America et al

Filing 19

ORDER adopting re 14 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, pla's official capacity claims for monetary damages, grievance claims and "seatbelt" claims are Dismissed from this action. Furthermore, Defts CCA, WCF - Medical Services, GDC, Sightler, Clark, Smith, Evans, Sikes, Harden, Johnson, Harris, Owens, Kemp, Conner, and John Does 1, 2, and 3 are Dismissed from this case. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 7/15/10. (cmr)

Dunn v. Corrections Corporation of America et al Doc. 19

ORIGINAL
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
DUBLIN DIVISION

Itf-:I^Ul C V3 MT

2110JUL 15 Ml 8:56

(
:

'

NATHANIEL THOMAS DUNN, Plaintiff,
V.

CV 309.-087

0. RODRIGUEZ, Deputy Warden of Care and Treatement, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed! Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiffs official capacity claims for monetary damages, grievance claims, and seatbelt" claims are DISMISSED from this action. Furthermore, Defendants Corrections Corporation of America, Wheeler Correctional Facility, Medical Services, and

'Although Plaintiff has entitled his responses to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as "Plaintiff['s] Objections," Plaintiff does not take issue with any of the Magistrate Judge's findings in his filings, and thus, the Court does not construe these filings as objections. Rather, Plaintiff is apparently dissatisfied that certain Defendants have not responded to his requests for production and that a hearing was scheduled in this case without proper notice. (lee doe. nos. 17, 18.) However, a review of the docket reveals that no hearings have been scheduled in this case. Furthermore, to the extent Plaintiff's filings may be construed as motions to compel, the Court notes that there is nothing in the record demonstrating that any Defendant has been served, much less an answer filed or a Scheduling Notice entered. Thus, any motions to compel are premature at best.

Dockets.Justia.com

the Georgia Department of Corrections, as well as Defendants Sightier, Clark, Smith, Evans, Sikes, Harden, Johnson, Harris, Owens, Kemp, Conner, and John Does 1, 2, and 3 are DISMISSED from this case. SO ORDERED thisof July, 2010, at

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

PA