Loadholt v. Parrish et al
Filing
49
ORDER finding as moot 38 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 45 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, deft Parrish and John or Jane Doe are Dismissed w/o prejudice. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 11/22/10. (cmr)
<![CDATA[
-WLB Loadholt v. Parrish et al
Doc. 49
ORIGINAL
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION ur -·-' -_ r' U
OLIVER C. LOADHOLT, Plaintiff,
V.
CV 309-91
DR. JOSEPH PARRISH, et al.. Defendants.
ORDER
After a careful, de nova review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Defendant Parrish" and the second unknown doctor, John or Jane Doe, are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to timely effect service, and Dr. Joe Paris' motion to dismiss (doe. no. 38) is deemed MOOT. SO ORDERED thisdav of November. 2010, at Augusta, Georgia.
UNIOTED
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
