Rincon v. Wells

Filing 20

ORDER adopting re 15 Report and Recommendations.; denying 18 Motion. Therefore, the instant petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DENIED, this civil action is CLOSED, and a final judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of Respondent. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 3/3/11. (cmr)

Rincon v. Wells

Doc. 20

ORIGINAL
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION RODRIGO JESUS R[NCON, Petitioner,
V. D

I

CV 309-099

WALT WELLS, Warden, Respondent.

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.' Therefore, the instant petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DENIED, this civil action is CLOSED, and a finJ judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of Respondent. SO ORDERED this day of March, 11, at Augusta, Gporgia, -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JU

'Petitioner filed a motion for discovery requesting various documents related to the prisoner meal monitoring data at McRae Correctional Facility. (Doc. no- 18.) An identical motion by Petitioner was previously denied by the Magistrate Judge due to Plaintiffs failure to show a specific need for the documents. (Doe. no. 11.) Additionally, Petitioner's argument that his due process rights were violated because he was unable to present information from the requested documents during his disciplinary hearings was directly rejected in the Report and Recommendation that is now the opinion of this Court. (Doe. no. 1 5, pp. 8-9.) Therefore, Petitioner's motion for discovery (doe. no. 18) is DENIED.

Dockets.Justia.com