Thomas v. Ricks et al

Filing 40

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting re 38 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, Judgment is entered in favor of deft Kemp only. Pla's claim that Deft Ricks retaliated against him for filing a grievance will proceed to trial. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 2/29/12. (cmr)

Download PDF
ORiGINAL FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT U.S. DISTRICT COURT AUGUSTA DIV. FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA FEB 2 q A 42 DUBLIN DIVISION CLERQ EUGENE THOMAS, Plaintiff, V. CV 310-019 KRISTY RICKS, Mailroom Clerk, and RALPH KEMP, Warden, Defendants. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Defendants' motion for summary judgment (doe, no. 29) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and a FINAL JUDGMENT in this case shall be entered in favor of Defendant Kemp only. Plaintiff's claim that Defendant Ricks retaliated against him for filinggrie 'anee will proceed to trial. SO ORDERED this 'of February20 12, at Augusta, Georgia. UNITED STMES DISTRICT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?