Howard v. Wilkes et al

Filing 14

ORDER finding as moot 7 Motion to Amend/Correct; finding as moot 10 Motion to Dismiss; adopting re 12 Report and Recommendations. This case is Dismissed, without prejudice and stands Closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 9/16/10. (cmr)

Download PDF
Howard v. Wilkes et al Doc. 14 ORIGINAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION LAMONT HOWARD, Plaintiff. V. U.S FILED "T I9I0SEPI6 PM: CLERK__________ SO. DIS-. F GA. CV 310-024 SCOTT WILKES, et al., Defendants. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, as Plaintiff has neither fulfilled the requirements for proceeding in ibrrnapauperis, nor paid the filing fee, this case is DISMISSED, without prejudice. In light of the dismissal, Plaintiffs motion to amend his complaint is deemed MOOT (doe. no. 7), and his motion to dismiss his "RICO Statement" filed on May 6, 2010, is also deemed MOOT(doc. no. 10). SO ORDERED this41-7 --Y UNITED S

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?