Winkels v. Morales et al

Filing 21

ORDER adopting re 13 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, Plaintiff's claims for mishandling grievances, denial of access to the courts, invasion of bodily privacy, deliberate indifference to a serious medical need, violation of the American s with Disabilities Act, and deliberate indifference through negligent hiring or supervision are DISMISSED. In addition, Defendants Morris, Clark, and ddition, Defendants Morris, Clark, and Henderson are DISMISSED from this case. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 3/29/11. (cmr)

-WLB Winkels v. Morales et al

Doc. 21

*

v AL
o;sc'PcoURT MlG1iT DV.
2011 MAR 2 q A fi: 02

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. DUBLIN DIVISION

CLERK LAWRENCE WINKELS, Plaintiff,
V.

4:--

CV 310M76

JOSE MORALES, Warden, et al., Defendants.

ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff's claims for mishandling grievances, denial of access to the courts, invasion of bodily privacy, deliberate indifference to a serious medical need, violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and deliberate indifference through negligent hiring or supervision are DISMISSED. In addition, Defendants Morris, Clark, and Henderson are DISMISSED from this case. SO ORDERED this ay of March, 20 1,1, at Augusta, ia.

Ib'IIM1II 1(.JJiI

Dockets.Justia.com