Riley v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al

Filing 20

ORDER denying as moot 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying as moot 4 Motion ; adopting - re 13 Report and Recommendations. Defendants Cagle, Baker, Henderson, Upton, "John Doe Health Care Service Inc.", Kemp, Troop, Rodriguez, Deal, Owens, Taylor, GDOC, and Health Care Services Utilization Managments are Dismissed from this case. Plaintiff's amended complaint is Dismissed and this civil action shall be Closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 7/12/12. (cmr)

Download PDF
ORIG AL U.S. UiFCcURT AUGUSTA WV. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2012JUL 12 PM 2:28 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA CLERK j__ SO. DIST. OF GA. DUBLIN DIVISION ADRIAN BERNARD RILEY, Plaintiff, CV 311-102 V. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed.' Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, the following Defendants are DISMISSED from this case: Defendants Cagle, Baker, Henderson, Upton, "John Doe Health Care Service Inc.," Kemp, Troop, Rodriguez, Deal, Owens, Taylor, GDOC, and Health Care Services Utilization Management. Furthermore, Plaintiffs amended complaint is DISMISSED for failure to 'Plaintiff requested, and was granted, two extensions of time in which to object to the Report and Recommendation. (Doe. nos. 15-18.) However, Plaintiff did not file objections within the twice-extended time limit. state a claim upon which relief maybe granted, Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief are DENIED AS MOOT (doe. nos. 3, 4), and this civil action shall be CLOSED. SO ORDERED this 1 Pay of July, 2012, at Augusta, Georgia. VA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?