Riley v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
Filing
20
ORDER denying as moot 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying as moot 4 Motion ; adopting - re 13 Report and Recommendations. Defendants Cagle, Baker, Henderson, Upton, "John Doe Health Care Service Inc.", Kemp, Troop, Rodriguez, Deal, Owens, Taylor, GDOC, and Health Care Services Utilization Managments are Dismissed from this case. Plaintiff's amended complaint is Dismissed and this civil action shall be Closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 7/12/12. (cmr)
ORIG AL
U.S. UiFCcURT
AUGUSTA WV.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2012JUL 12 PM 2:28
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
CLERK
j__
SO. DIST. OF GA.
DUBLIN DIVISION
ADRIAN BERNARD RILEY,
Plaintiff,
CV 311-102
V.
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed.' Accordingly,
the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of
the Court. Therefore, the following Defendants are DISMISSED from this case:
Defendants Cagle, Baker, Henderson, Upton, "John Doe Health Care Service Inc.," Kemp,
Troop, Rodriguez, Deal, Owens, Taylor, GDOC, and Health Care Services Utilization
Management. Furthermore, Plaintiffs amended complaint is DISMISSED for failure to
'Plaintiff requested, and was granted, two extensions of time in which to object to the
Report and Recommendation. (Doe. nos. 15-18.) However, Plaintiff did not file objections
within the twice-extended time limit.
state a claim upon which relief maybe granted, Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive
relief are DENIED AS MOOT (doe. nos. 3, 4), and this civil action shall be CLOSED.
SO ORDERED this 1 Pay of July, 2012, at Augusta, Georgia.
VA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?