Henderson v. Wright et al

Filing 7

ORDER denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; adopting re 3 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, this action is Dismissed w/o prejudice. If pla wishes to proceed with these claims, he must submit a new complaint and the full filing fee. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 2/7/12. (cmr)

ORIGINAL
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FILED
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
AUGUSTA DIV.

20IIFEB-7 AM 9:3

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

CLE
DUBLIN DIVISION

OF GA.

KEITH HENDERSON,
Plaintiff,
CV 311-110

V.

Officer S. WRIGHT, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER

Alter a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed.' Accordingly,
the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of
the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion to proceed informapauperis is DENIED (doc. no.
2), and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the
claims raised in this lawsuit, he must submit a new complaint, along with the full filing fee.
Dut,ree v. Paimer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (1 lth Cir. 2002) (per curiam).
SO ORDERED this

'7 ay of February, 2012, at Augusta, Georgia.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT
'Following issuance of the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff filed two "Notices"
providing additional information about his claims, such as the identity of potential witness
to the events alleged in his complaint. (Doc. nos. 5, 6.) Because these filings neither address
nor call into question the Magistrate Judge's conclusion that this case should be dismissed
under the "three strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), they do not warrant further
discussion.