Hawkins v. Morales et al

Filing 12

ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, this case is Dismissed without prejudice as a sanction for abuse of the judicial process and this civil action is Closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 2/12/13. (cmr)

Download PDF
O IGINAL R ' 't'ili1:iilir':: COURT IN THE UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT ;T[3J2 Pti 4: 55 THESOUTHERN DISTRICT GEORGIAI":1 FOR OF DUBLIN DIVISION ALONZOHAWKINS, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) cv 312-096 e DEPARTMENTOF CORRECTIONS, t ) al., ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER After a careful,de novoreitew of the file, the Courtconcurs with the Magistrate ("R&R"), to whichno objections havebeenproperly Judge's ReportandRecommendation filed.' Rather,a document titled "Objection"was filed by an inmateclaimingto act on Plaintiffs behalf. (Doc.no. I l.) While this inmateclaimsto havebeenprovidinglegal to to in assistance Plaintiff,he hasnot shownthat he is attomeyauthorized practice this in Loc. R. he Court;asa result, maynot actasPlaintiffs legalrepresentative this case.See whileFederal Ruleof Civil Procedure 11(a) andLocalRule 11.1 83.1-83.4. Moreover, only thatpro selitigants signall filingswith this Court,the"Objection"wassigned require providing legalassistance, by Plaintiff. Finally,LocalRule72.3provides not by theinmate 'Plaintiff submitteda filing titled "Notice of Failure to Notifu," in which he the a copyofthe R&R. (Doc.no.9.) Accordingly, that contended hedid notreceive service the the the directed Clerkto re-serve R&R andextended time for Plaintiff Magistrate Judge throughlanuary22,2013. (Doc.no. 10.) The instantfiling wastimely to file objections period. within this extended submitted mayfile objections a Magistrate to thatonlyparties thecase to Judge's R&R, andtheinmate providinglegalassistance not a partyto thiscase.Forthese is reasons, Courlconcludes the havebeenproperly filed in this case. thatno objections In any event, evenif theyhadbeenproperlyfiled, the objections meritless are and provideno basisfor departing from the conclusion the R&R. The Magistrate in Judge recommended case dismissed the be withoutprejudice Plaintiffabused because thejudicial process providingfalseinformation by abouthis filing history. (Doc.no. 7.) In particular, foundthatPlaintiffonlydisclosed priorcase hadfiledin federal theMagisfateJudge one he Judgewas awareof at leasttwo. (Id. at 2-3.) The inmate court,when the Magistrate providinglegalassistance alleges hewasresponsible thefailureto disclose prior that for the case because wasnotaware it, andthatit wasnotPlaintiff s norhis intentto "give false he of information providefalsestatements theCourts." (Doc.no. 11,p.2.) or to Regardless the reasons failing to disclose prior case,however,it was of for the Plaintiffwho sigrred complaint, the includingthefalseinformation abouthis filing history, andwho, by doingso,declared truth of the contents the complaint the of underpenalty of (See perjury.2 provided doc.no. 1,p. 10.)Thus,Plaintiffclearly falseinformation about his filing history andtheCourtcannot tolerate suchabuse ofthe judicial process.SeeRivera (17thCir.1998) (ernphasizing v. Allin, 144F.3d719,721-27 seriousness ofjudicial ofabuse 'The Courtis aware providinglegalassistance thattheinmate that alleges Plaintiff is illiterateandhas'lnentalhealthissues."(Doc.no. I l, p. 2.) Notably,howe\/er, Plaintiff everyfiling submitted underhis namein this case signed until the instant objections.(See the doc.no. 1,pp. 10,11; doc.no.2, p. 2; doc.no.4;doc.no.9,p. 1.) Accordingly, Court particularlyas they come from is not persuaded theseunsubstantiated by allegations, not to in someone authorized act asPlaintiffs legalrepresentative this caseandhavenot by beenverifiedor authenticated Plaintiffhimself. process occurs that whenlitigantlies abouttheexistence prior lawsuit),abrogated ofa on grounds Jones Bock,549U.S.199(2007). v. other by the Accordingly, Report Recommendation Magistrate and ofthe Judge ADOPTED is is as the opinionof the Cour1.Therefore, case DISMISSED withoutprejudiceas a this and sanction abuse for ofthejudicial process, this civil actionis CLOSED.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?