HOLMES v. DALRYMPLE et al

Filing 67

ORDER adopting 63 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's official capacity claims for money damages against Defendants are dismissed, but Defendants' motion to d ismiss Plaintiff's amended complaint in its entirety is denied. This case shall proceed on the other claims. Once defendants' answer is filed, the Clerk shall issue a scheduling notice setting deadlines. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 10/23/13. (cmr)

Download PDF
' ',llijf',iP,t$,* ::1,1 I .:.!,1{ | ' r-i I DISTRICT COURT?0,3 IN TI{E TINITED STATES {)CT ?!zz FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICTOF GEORQ$X6 -' s0. DUBLIN DIVISION MORRISSCOTTHOLMES, Plaintiff, cv 312-099 BARBARA DALRYMPLE,Doctor, State Prison, al., Johnson et Defendants. ORDER After a careful,de novo reviewof the file, the Courtconcurs with the Magistrate ReportandRecommendation, which objections to havebeenfiled (doc.nos.65, Judge's 66). Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation the MagistrateJudge is of Defendants' ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, motion to dismissis GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (Doc. no. 47.) Plaintiffs official capacity claims for money damagesagainst Defendantsare DISMISSED, but motionto dismiss PlaintifPsamended complaint its entiretyis DENIED. Defendants' in The caseshall thus proceed Plaintiffs remainingclaimsagainst on Defendants their in individualcapacities stated the ReportandRecommendation. as in Moreover, stayof the discovery in this case is lifted, aad pursuantto Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Defendants to 12(a)(4)(A), shall file an answer Plaintiffs amended complaintwithin 14 answer, Clerk shall the daysof the dateof this Order. Upon the filing of Defendants' ines the issue Scheduling Noticesetting deadl in thiscase. a SO ORDERED thi"4Kyof ceorgia. Ocrober,2013,arAugusta,

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?