United States Of America v. Harrell et al

Filing 41

ORDER STAYING CASE an additional 90 days from the date of this order, at which time the parties shall file a status report with the Court. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 2/19/15. (cmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, CV v, 312-111 LISTER HARRELL; SARALAND, LLLP; MIDDLE GEORGIA ROAD BUILDERS, INC.; and ROBERT SUTTON, Defendants. ORDER Presently before the Court is the parties'1 joint motion to continue the stay first imposed on July 2, 2014. On October 7, 2014 and December 16, 2014, this (Docs. 33, 40.) Court granted two additional sixty-day extensions (docs. 37, 39) to allow the parties to complete the drafting of the settlement documents and seek the requisite approval from the bankruptcy court, all settling parties, and the appropriate officials within the federal government. United States Saraland Sutton LLLP, have resolves a Environmental Middle entered With the present motion, 1 Defendant motion. Lister Georgia into significant Protection an Road Agency Builders, Administrative portion of the Inc., Order case. and on (Doc. The Defendants and Robert Consent 40, Ex. that A.) the parties seek to continue the stay for Harrell has defaulted and is not a party to this an additional 90 days to allow the bankruptcy court to approve Defendant Saraland's obligations under the Administrative Order on Consent, and to allow the parties to reach an agreement on draft consent decree language. For good cause shown, matter shall this Order, be STAYED the motion (doc. an additional NINETY at which time the parties shall 40) is GRANTED. DAYS from the This date of file a status report with the Court. ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this /y^1 day of February, 2015. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHgWDISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?