Finn v. Medlin et al

Filing 17

ORDER adopting 9 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, certain claims are dismissed and the following defendants are dismissed, CCA, Warden Medlin, Quinn, Miles, Harris, Smith, Day, Phillips, and John & Jane Does. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 10/08/13. (cmr)

Download PDF
fIRIGINAL l u.s. orslrllFQ.n,,o' j:4 " t':' _ r' ?08 -8 A q 35 ocr DISTRICT GEORCIA FORTHE SOUTHERN OF IN THE L]NITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT DUBLIN DIVISION C! rtrz /-n l_' f.j, r l-ar.1( -twtt.u+!_ MICHAEL S.FINN.SR.. Plaintifi cv 313-026 JASONMEDLIN, Warden, a1., et Defendants. ORDER After a careful,de novorcviewof the file, the Courtconcurs with the Magistrate Judge's ReportandRecommendation, which objections to havebeenfiled (doc.no. 15).' Accordingly,the ReportandRecommendation the Magistrate of Judge ADOPTED as is the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiffs following claimsare DISMISSED for failure to statea claim upon which relief may be granted: his free exercise, Religious Persons Act ("RLUIPA"), and retaliationclaims; his Land Use and Institutionalized with Disabilities of 1990('ADA') against Act claimsunderTitle II of the Americans the CorrectionsCorporation America ("CCA"); his claim under Title II of the ADA of againstWardenMedlin, and Defendants Quinn,Miles, Harris,Smith,Day, Phillips,and Doesin their official andindividualcapacities; his claim underTitle II and JohnandJane in Commissioner Owens his individualcapacity.Further, Defendants of the ADA against 'Plaintiff requested, and was granted,an extensionof time in which to object to the Report and Recommendation.(Doc. nos. 12, 13.) CCA, Warden Medlin, Quinn, Miles, Harris, Smith, Day, Phillips, and John and Jane DoesareDISMISSED.2 lt9 rl' 2013,at Augusta, Georgia. this J dayof October, SO ORDERED 'As explained the Magistrate Judge's Orderof July 25, 2013,Plaintiff s claim in Owensin his official capacityshall under Title II of the ADA againstCommissioner proceed. (See no. 11.) doc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?