Paine v. Kemp et al

Filing 23

ORDER adopting 20 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, the case is dismissed without prejudice, and this civil action is closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 7/10/13. (cmr)

Download PDF
ORIGINAL DISTRICT COURT IN THE UNITEDSTATBS FILED U . S . I S T R IC O U R T O CT OIV. "\IISUSTA ?0l3JUL AHil: l0 t3 DISTRICT GEORGIA OF FORTHESOUTHERN c' to* ---"'i6. C-^Ag[c* DIVISION DUBLTN d'Bm'FT[.-HEZEKIAHPAINE, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) cv 313-029 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RALPH KEMP, et a1., Def'endants. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurswith the Magistrate ("R&R'), to which no objectionshavebeen filed. In Judge'sRepon and Recommendation that Plaintiff s complaint be dismissedfor his R&R, the Magistrate Judgerecommended failure to comply with the terms of an Order enteredon May 8, 2013, that directedPlaintiff to submit an amendedcomplaint within thirly (30) daysdue to pleading deficiencies. (See generallydoc. nos. 19,20.) Although Plaintiffhas now submittedan amendedcomplarnt, it is datedJune 14,2013, indicating that Plaintiff did not actuallyprepareor file it until after the expiredon June7,2013. (Doc. no. 22,p.5.) Moreover,despite the specified deadline MagistrateJudge's clear instructionsto attachno more than six handwritten pagesto the elevenindividually-numberedand amended complaint (doc. no. 19, p. 4). Plaintiff attached handwrittenpagesto the same. (Id. at 6-16.) In short, Plaintiff s untimely amendedcomplaint is exhibitive of his persistentand oved non-compliancewith Court Orders,and it thereforeprovides no basis for deviation that from the MagistrateJudge'srecommendation the instantcasebe dismissedfor that very reason. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's R&R is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, this case is DISMISSED rvithout prejudice, and this civil action is CLOSED. trrl. Georgra. SOORDERED @Yv o*)r. ,otr. atAugusta, UNITEDSTA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?