Hester v. Laurens County Board of Commissioners et al

Filing 32

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. The motion to withdraw as attorney is granted. Each party shall bear their own costs. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 5/26/15. (cmr)

IN

THE UNITED STAEES DISIRICT
COI'RT FOR
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF GEORGIA
DI'BLIN DIVISION

AMANDA NICOIE

HESTER,

Plaintiff,
*

v.

a\/

?T ?-no?

THAD DELOACHand
W]LL]AM MEEKS,
*

Defendant s

ORDER

On Decercer
action
ihi

q

Tl^a

a.rrrj-

and ics

ff i-ro
!
vE

nandcn.rr

entries

sLaff.

ow

:nd

nano
lJqvs

Or,aar

r-:-r

remaln.ing parties,
2I .)

On April

Hester

fifed

substantial
27.)

7,

r-:ca

LIE

h,rc

effort

20I4,

nraci.iih^

wrrrg

ennrrmrr'l

2015,

after

1r l
, , Y ;_ *.* g e

'-r-h
w._Li'

. 1r - u e >

counsef
to

entered
rI ac J y c r .na-tL

as

such withdrawal

is

counsel wherein counsel for

a

has "ceased to communicate with

to

r1-rr-

her counseL."

a

LwenLyrh6

i-r^r^

(Doc, no.

1n which

were stated.

explains

brieling,

Arnanda Nlcofe

counsef

renewed motion
Pfaintiff

rhi

r ^

Meeks.

f ot: Plaintiff

withdraw

>l-od

extensive

no

(Doc. no.

(Doc. no. 28.)

the Court denled the motlon.
Court

civll

expended by the Court

Thad Deloach and William

reasons for

the

t h iq

31,
tha

a motion

Upon review,

Now before

nf

yvllrrlJL|t']L}

and no small

rnh

removed this

Court of Lau-rensCounry, Georgia,

On July

raca:

Defendants

2013,

from the Superior

one docket

rarri

20,

to

withdraw

that

as

Plaintiff

(Doc. no.

29.)

court I s power to controL

A district
Lhe inherent

(11th

998

dismissal

Am. Aorlbuslness

Cir.

1983).

'l'srn'ss

Fn\/

prejudice
r ea con:hl

-rn

sufficient

matter
Plainl-

that

mnt naqq/'\

inl-

that

n
y !r

is
is

not
the

this

bear their

Firm,
(doc.

case is

L

i ^h

L'i r-h

a civi-l

^r

motion for

lnclined
Court

to

L'i rh^,,1

action

with

provides

counsef

the Court to

prosecute

incfined

fT IS HERtBy ORDERED
that

to withdrah/ as counsel f1led

P.C.,

. \vcoa - r r l - u
qu

sua sponLe .

to

the

badoer

' In g n e r c a s e .

r-r nra<<

The Cfairborne
Wooff,

f

in the instant

Neither

Upon the foregoing,
motion

.)
v!

Plainciff's

Pfalntiff

further.
iff

r^,Anr

record,

fai_lure to prosecute

information

permit

Rules

to prosec-rr-e his

faiLs

t.o counsel of

f or

[for]
F

conclude

ian

F.'

F.2d

P. 41(b) ; L. R. 41.1(c) (an ..assigned

or her case. Fed. R. Civ.
norice

jII

S.A-,

and Local

oI acL-ons where a plaintiff

Judge may, afrer

Foods de Cenrro

Dev. Corp.,

Federal

incfudes

docket

power ro dism-iss a case. Oualitv

Am., S.A, v. Latin
989,

its

no.

P.C.,
29) is

S.

the renewed

b y W i _ 1 1 i a mR . C l a i r b o r n e .

Wefsey Wooff,

cRjAtITED. IT

Welsey

and S.

IS FURTBERORDERED

DISMISSED IIITII PREJUDICE. Each partv

shaff

o v n nc o s t s .

ORDER ENTERED at

Arr.rrlsf^

?nt

r :- A -^Y ^ * /
- - r-i

r

l--"l l . I S

4{>

,1.r

rj:

rr

z_r
f

q,

UNITED ST

ES DISTRICT JUDG