Munoz v. Stone et al

Filing 6

ORDER directing the plaintiff to submit another prisoner trust fund statements, (Compliance due by 9/30/2014). Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/5/14. (cmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION HERMAN MUNOZ, Plaintiff, v. CV 314-093 STACEY N. STONE, Warden, and STACY GILES, Health Service Administrator, Defendants. ORDER On August 22, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiff, an inmate at the McRae Correctional Facility in McRae, Georgia, permission to proceed in forma pauperis conditioned on his return of a Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement and Consent to Collection of Fees form. (See doc. no. 3.) Plaintiff returned both documents, but the Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement was not signed by a prison official as required by the Court’s August 22nd Order. Rather, Plaintiff signed the Statement on the line reserved for the “Signature of Authorized Officer of Institution.” (See doc. no. 5.) In relevant part, the Court’s August 22nd Order stated: (1) Plaintiff must furnish the enclosed Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement to the trust (financial) officer of each prison where he has been confined for the past six months. The trust officer will complete and sign the form and return the form and supporting documents to Plaintiff for submission to the Court. Two copies of the form are enclosed for this purpose. (Doc. no. 3, p. 3.) Plaintiff shall have until September 30, 2014, to submit the required Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement signed by an authorized prison official. The CLERK is DIRECTED to enclose two copies of the Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement with Plaintiff’s service copy of this Order. SO ORDERED this 5th day of September, 2014, at Augusta, Georgia. 4. k ~ , BRIAN K E S UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?