Clervrain et al v. Samuel et al

Filing 43

ORDER denying 42 Motion for Alien Status or Pauperis Status. The Clerk is directed not to accept any other filing in this case. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 10/06/2021. (jlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA i! DUBLIN DIVISION u.s.d ; m\ GCT -b P 2M9 ●k MENETIRONY CLERVRAIN, et al., I k k Plaintiffs, k k V . CV 314-107 * CHARLES SAMUEL, Director, Bureau of Prisons, et al. , * k k Defendants. ORDER Before Menetirony the Court Clervrain is a pro N\ titled se motion filed FOR [ 'ALIEN MOTION by Plaintiff STATUS' ] OR [ 'PAUPERIS STATUS"] OR CRITERIA TO CONSIDER BY INVOKING THE ANT{s) MOVEMENT ACT ("TAMA") . rt group of civil action was dismissed the dismissal almost seven years ago. McRae on August 29, In July of Court recently rhyme or reason. judgment including entered on Plaintiff was released from 2019. this year. described // and inmates, was who were incarcerated at McRae Correctional Facility in case a This Plaintiff, The by 42. ) in Georgia. 2014 No. initiated McRae, September (Doc. (See Plaintiff \\ as Order filed two motions unintelligible of August 3, // and 2021, w that the without any Doc. No. 41. ) The instant motion under consideration is 28 pages of more of the same. There is in fact no discernible claim for relief and no pending litigation pauperis status. for which the Court need consider in forma The Court intuits Plaintiff will not relent in these filings because it costs him nothing; meanwhile, the Court is wasting its resources in docketing, considering, and resolving Plaintiff's frivolous The motions. Court will not countenance this conduct any longer. Upon the foregoing. Plaintiff's latest motion (doc. no. 42) is DENIED. The Clerk is directed not to accept any other filing in this case. ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this day of October, 2021. I UNITED STA1>ES DISTRICT JUDG 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?