Clervrain et al v. Samuel et al
Filing
43
ORDER denying 42 Motion for Alien Status or Pauperis Status. The Clerk is directed not to accept any other filing in this case. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 10/06/2021. (jlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
i!
DUBLIN DIVISION
u.s.d ;
m\ GCT -b P 2M9
●k
MENETIRONY CLERVRAIN, et al.,
I
k
k
Plaintiffs,
k
k
V .
CV 314-107
*
CHARLES SAMUEL, Director,
Bureau of Prisons, et al. ,
*
k
k
Defendants.
ORDER
Before
Menetirony
the
Court
Clervrain
is
a
pro
N\
titled
se
motion
filed
FOR
[ 'ALIEN
MOTION
by
Plaintiff
STATUS' ]
OR
[ 'PAUPERIS STATUS"] OR CRITERIA TO CONSIDER BY INVOKING THE ANT{s)
MOVEMENT
ACT
("TAMA") .
rt
group
of
civil
action
was
dismissed
the dismissal almost seven years ago.
McRae on August 29,
In
July
of
Court
recently
rhyme
or
reason.
judgment
including
entered on
Plaintiff was released from
2019.
this
year.
described
//
and
inmates,
was
who were incarcerated at McRae Correctional Facility in
case
a
This
Plaintiff,
The
by
42. )
in
Georgia.
2014
No.
initiated
McRae,
September
(Doc.
(See
Plaintiff
\\
as
Order
filed
two motions
unintelligible
of
August
3,
//
and
2021,
w
that
the
without
any
Doc.
No.
41. )
The instant motion under consideration is 28 pages of more of the
same.
There
is
in
fact
no
discernible
claim
for
relief
and
no
pending
litigation
pauperis status.
for
which
the
Court
need
consider
in
forma
The Court intuits Plaintiff will not relent in
these filings because it costs him nothing; meanwhile, the Court
is wasting its resources in docketing, considering, and resolving
Plaintiff's frivolous
The
motions.
Court
will
not countenance
this conduct any longer.
Upon the foregoing. Plaintiff's latest motion (doc. no. 42)
is DENIED.
The Clerk is directed not to accept any other filing
in this case.
ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this
day of October,
2021.
I
UNITED STA1>ES DISTRICT JUDG
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?