Beasley v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1

Filing 15

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear their own costs. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 7/6/15. (cmr)

Download PDF
ORI6INAL IN *u lltsJUI Pt _5 "?if,F,iP THE TTNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBI,IN DIVISION lt CARILYNN BEASLEY, CIVIL ACTION cv 314-110 BENEFIT AT&T WBRELLA PLAN NO. 1* Defendants, ORDER On July the 20L5, of Dismissal "stipulation fh^t 2, narfies claims PRE,JUDICE. The Clerk Dartsv shall- bear and of Case with Defendant Prejudice, have reached a settlement.. wit.h Federal- Rule of Civil Plaintiff's Plaintiff their ORDERENIERED at Procedure asainst is a " indicating In accordance +t(a) , IT Is oRDERED that Defendant directed filed to are DISMISSED WITH CLOSE this case. Each own costs. Augusta, Georgia, this /4 20L5 " DI STRI CT day of 14 Filed07102115 Case3:14-cv-00110-DHB-BKE Document PaqeL of 3 L\I THE UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION CARI LYNN BEASLEY, Plaintiff, :CI\IIL ACTION NO.3:14-cv-00110-DHB-BKE AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO.I, Defendant. STIPULATION OF DISNtrSSAL OF CASE WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant Rule 41(a)(1) of the FederalRules of Civil Procedure, conjunctionwith to in Local Rule 41.2of the Local Rulesofthe Southem District of Georgia,it is herebystipulatedby the padies, through their attorneys,that the above-entitledaction, having been settled by of agreement the parties,may be dismissed with prejudice,with eachparty to bearher or its own costs. Respectfully submitted 2nd ofJuly, 2015. day this \/ Bradle.vG. Pvles BRADLEY G. PYLES Georgia No. 590545 Bar KEVIN W. HALL Georgia No. 3 19339 Bar WESTMORELAND, PATTERSON,MOSELEY & HINSON, LLP 577 Mulberry Street,Suite600 P.O.Box 1797 Macon,GA 31202-1797 (478) 745 -1651(telephone) (478) 74s-17s4 bg.pyles@wpmhlegal.com ATTORNEYS FORPLAINTIFF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?