Beasley v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
Filing
15
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear their own costs. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 7/6/15. (cmr)
ORI6INAL
IN
*u
lltsJUI Pt
_5
"?if,F,iP
THE TTNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
DUBI,IN DIVISION
lt
CARILYNN BEASLEY,
CIVIL ACTION
cv 314-110
BENEFIT
AT&T WBRELLA
PLAN NO.
1*
Defendants,
ORDER
On
July
the
20L5,
of Dismissal
"stipulation
fh^t
2,
narfies
claims
PRE,JUDICE. The Clerk
Dartsv shall- bear
and
of Case with
Defendant
Prejudice,
have reached a settlement..
wit.h Federal- Rule of Civil
Plaintiff's
Plaintiff
their
ORDERENIERED at
Procedure
asainst
is
a
" indicating
In
accordance
+t(a) , IT Is oRDERED
that
Defendant
directed
filed
to
are
DISMISSED WITH
CLOSE this
case.
Each
own costs.
Augusta,
Georgia,
this
/4
20L5 "
DI STRI CT
day of
14 Filed07102115
Case3:14-cv-00110-DHB-BKE
Document
PaqeL of 3
L\I THE UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
DUBLIN DIVISION
CARI LYNN BEASLEY,
Plaintiff,
:CI\IIL ACTION NO.3:14-cv-00110-DHB-BKE
AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN
NO.I,
Defendant.
STIPULATION OF DISNtrSSAL OF CASE WITH PREJUDICE
Pursuant Rule 41(a)(1) of the FederalRules of Civil Procedure, conjunctionwith
to
in
Local Rule 41.2of the Local Rulesofthe Southem
District of Georgia,it is herebystipulatedby
the padies, through their attorneys,that the above-entitledaction, having been settled by
of
agreement the parties,may be dismissed
with prejudice,with eachparty to bearher or its own
costs.
Respectfully
submitted 2nd ofJuly, 2015.
day
this
\/ Bradle.vG. Pvles
BRADLEY G. PYLES
Georgia No. 590545
Bar
KEVIN W. HALL
Georgia No. 3 19339
Bar
WESTMORELAND, PATTERSON,MOSELEY &
HINSON, LLP
577 Mulberry Street,Suite600
P.O.Box 1797
Macon,GA 31202-1797
(478) 745 -1651(telephone)
(478)
74s-17s4
bg.pyles@wpmhlegal.com
ATTORNEYS FORPLAINTIFF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?