Lott v. Willis of Tennesee Inc. et al
Filing
6
ORDER adopting the 3 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion; denying Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and dismissing this action without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this lawsuit, he must initiate a new lawsuit by filing a new complaint. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 12/8/2014. (jah)
F! D
U.S.fl,'r -f r'.l.iiT
A U O U S i iAi
I;
-8
lilt 0Ec A S 0l
DUBLIN DIVISION
MAC'KH
CLEi;1
LOTT,
Plaintift,
l1
c v 3 1 4 -7
Defbndants.
ORDER.
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurswith the MagistrateJudge's
and
R.eport
to
cornmendation, which no objectionshave been filed,L Accordingly, the Court
AIIOPTS
of
Repod and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES
no,
Plaintiff's requestro proceedin./brma pauperis (c{oo. 2), and DIS
SSES this action w-ithout
he
with the claimsraisedin this lalvsr,rit, must initi
prejudice. If Plaintiff wishesto proceed
lawsuitby filing a new complaint.
SO O
ERED this a
a new
, 284 F.ld 1234,1236(l lth Cir. 2002).
-tlay
2014.at Augrusta.
Georgia.
o{'December.
"6-
' Plaintiff hasfiled a documenttitled "Relation Back" which references casein the foliddle
a
qf Georgiaand recitesvariousproceduralnrlesin a nonsensical
patternbut containsnothing
Districr
(Doc.no. 5.)
on
with anybearing theCourt'sanalysis.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?