Henry et al v. Community of Hope Center, Inc. et al

Filing 49

ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to enter enter judgment against Community of Hope Center, Inc. d/b/a Walter Wesley Joyner Academy and in favor of Plaintiff Carolyn Home in the amount of $870.40. The Clerk shall send a service copy of this Order to the following address: Community of Hope Center, Inc. c/o Mr. Johnny Vaughn at Post Office Box 1072, Dublin, Georgia 31040. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 03/23/2017. (thb)

Download PDF
FILED U.S. DISTRICT COUR IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION StNUlST. 0 * * HORNE, -mv. 201? MAR 23 PM ?* '' WILLIE MACK HENRY, BRIAN POWELL, * SHAUN POWELL, MELVIN THOMAS, EBB * O'NEAL, JR., AUTHOR LEE HAVARD, CHARLINE WRIGHT, and CAROLYN l '^"" i lST;i niw * * Plaintiffs, * * V. * CV 314-118 5 COMMUNITY OF HOPE CENTER, INC., * d/b/a WALTER WESLEY JOYNER * ACADEMY and JOHNNY VAUGHN, * * Defendants. * ORDER On March 1, 2017, this Court entered default judgment in favor of all named Plaintiffs in this action except Plaintiff Carolyn Home because respecting her damages. no evidence had been submitted On March 14, 2017, Plaintiff Home submitted an affidavit in support of her damages claim against Defendant Community of Hope Center, Inc. d/b/a Walter Wesley Joyner Academy (the "Academy") under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seg. Plaintiff Home seeks unpaid overtime wages. Incorporating herein the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Order of March 1, 2017, Plaintiff Home is entitled to default judgment. "[T] hree distinct matters [are] essential in considering any default judgment: (1) jurisdiction; (2) liability; and (3) damages." Pitts ex rel. Pitts V. Seneca Sports, Inc.. 321 F. Supp. 2d 1353, 1356 (S.D. Ga. 2004). complaint In sum, the allegations of the instant establishes this Court has jurisdiction. The complaint also establishes that Plaintiff Home was employed by the Academy and treated as an exempt employee under the FLSA when in fact she was not. Consequently, Plaintiff Home worked overtime hours for which she was not paid when in fact she should have been. Moreover, the Academy's failure to pay overtime wages to Plaintiff Home was ''willful" within the meaning of the FLSA.^ Thus, the Academy is liable to Plaintiff for overtime pay and statutory damages. With respect to Plaintiff Home's damages, under § 207 of the FLSA, "an employer may not employ his employee for a workweek longer than forty hours unless his employee receives overtime compensation at a rate not less than one and a half times his regular rate." Allen v. Bd. of Pub. Educ. for Bibb Cntv.. 495 F.3d 1306, 1314 (11th Cir. 2007) (citing 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1)). In this case, Plaintiff Home worked 40 hours of overtime from the period of June 3, 2013 to August 1, 2013. ^ The allegation of willfulness is important because a district court has no discretion to reduce or deny an award of liquidated damages under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) if the FLSA violation was willful. Morgan v. Familv Dollar Stores. Inc.. 551 F.3d 1233, 1282-83 (11^^ Cir. 2008). (See Aff. of Carolyn Home, HH 4-5.) Her overtime rate of compensation for that time period would have been $10.88. (Id.. ^ 8.) Plaintiff Home should have been paid $435.20 (40 X $10.88) in overtime during that therefore owed $435.20 in overtime time period; she is wages and $435.20 in statutory damages, for a total damages award of $870.40. Upon the foregoing, the Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT against Community of Hope Center, Inc. d/b/a Walter Wesley Joyner Academy and in favor of Plaintiff Carolyn Home in the amount of $870.40. The Clerk shall send a service copy of this Order to the following address: Community of Hope Center, Inc. c/o Mr. Johnny Vaughn Post Office Box 1072 Dublin, Georgia 31040 ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this March, 2017. UNITED STATES DISTRICT day of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?