Harrell v. Drake

Filing 12

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL/CASE. The case is closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 1/13/15. (cmr)

i,R
IGINAL

rlr. i
i r r _ _ l .Iltu i c o U

,r :. l-lv.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COT'RT FOR IHE
SOUTHERNDISTRICT OF GEORGIA
z8isJAit
t3
DUB],IN DIVISION
CLf-R5
S

I N R E : L I S T E R W . HARRELL, *

sr. 0FGt'-

C a s e N o . 3 1 4- 0 1 2 I
( B a n k r . C a s e N o . 1 2 - 3 0 1 1 2)

Debtor.

ORDER

On December 9t 2014, this
W.

mot i on

HarrelL's

^nn.\i nirrFnf
u re c
w rr

of

nirron
9-vrrr

1 -U rr r
L a

dismissaf
Harrell

of

fi

l inn

-his

in

fL v
^

na\/
l/ql,

lL r -a
-h u

t haaa

rcY rf
- u r ru r i

i nnc

annea l

r cv
-! d

Mr

f r ir I r r n 9
i rn
-

be

foa

this

fifed

a

"Motion

to

Produce"

of

fl^a

hia

^ ^ca^,
y lr v J s u u ,L1E a
nnrr-inrc

filina

1^^'t

hic
urr
nf

fha

Mr.

order,

and a
Mr.

Order prior

Court's

the

fer-^

ObviousIy,

to

2

The motions are contained in a s.ingle filing,
The Clerk received the
dated December 1, 20L4.
December 10, 2014.
Tn

nr

of

i

\\nrnrjrr-r

ua..elL

receipt.

(Doc. No. 6 . )

for

and

to

had the benefit

mnr

pauperis

forma

henk-nnl-cv

Extension of Time. "1

had not

in

Prior

the appeal.

had caused to

"Mot ion for
Harrell

d r r)r/e
uu J

proceed

to

r-orrnscl

C o u r r d e n i e d l h e A p p e - L J - a nL i s t e r
t

nf

.\f

: Pye 1
q n n a :u r
rannrd

l-tanamhar

1fl

e1i^

infFr

1\

iaal"ni-^
fnr

l-^'.'

:nna:l

?\

)n1

A

Mr

IJrrral

i nqtruct.iOns
P^
t/v
in

. l L J fi Y nrrq u a
u aa ^l tf/1rma

which is
filing
on

nattnari

l

On

caalz<

how

tO

ralarr.ntc

fnrmc

of bankruptcy proceedings; 4)
and instructions;
3) transcripts
"communications" invofving
the crustees and the bankrupt.cy
and unfifed
court;
5) all- filed
"comrnunj-cations" from Mr.
court,'
all
Harre-LI to
the
bankruptcy
and 6)
evidence
i nn

Harrel,l

r -h a

l.\rhLr,rnr.\/

seeks an extension

/^.\,rrt'

c

nrrlar<

of time to

:nd

nrnnaadi

correct

na<

the defects

Mr

of

The court
filina

i^

il--

dockeLed in
in

^^rrrl-c.

rrA

..\rrrln! f
v

orders,

.h^a.l

ihr
<

Fr^m

l6+^*l^^,r!^,

y

L1 U.S.C.

orders

with

.f

a.,rrrf

.nl

'/

R.hLrrrbf

^r,

of

feave

-h^t

S 158(a) .

court,

prr'l< t\a
to

che court

A final

I r ri.ref ion
do but

92,

every

93 (l-1"" Cir.

Mr.

F.3d

Harre-LI's

practice

Order entered

as

by the

United

The practice

.annal

1-h^r

hie

^hna^

(Doc. No.

^nnr^a-h

I

in/-ln,,Jin.r

6.)

f^i

three

(2)

n c !Fr iu u o
^^e
y6

interlocutory
28

U.S,C.

S

See qenera-LIV
court

is

"one

ancl lca\/cc n^f hi r/'' f^*
In

re

Fulton,

111

omitted) .

the

Iast.

States

nn.lrla

lrrra

a

i!,.]^nante

1-im6

in

& 8003,

t^

year

of

appealing

Bankrupccy Court

.is nothing

ic.^nein.'r

1-ha

ihr'l

in a bankruptcy

over

AS
over

r}1o

described

(citation

Federal

S 158(a) (l);

na

judgment."

its

not be toferated.
l , a 1 -a

an additional

other

all

On Ehe merits

1997)

f

ra^u
- L u r runr ir r Y

order

execute

/1\

nr
u,

158 (a) (3) and Fed. R. BanKr. P. 8001(b)
28 U.S.C.

.

28 U.S.C.

(3)

cases

ruriSdiction.

in

and

1-\6a^

underlying

has filed

a^rrrl.

court

lr:c

-irr-i 5fliqlign

hac

i" ^rar v ,r
r n u - u q c i- n . 9

1121(d);

S

f i l! i!n n 9
!r r1

and the

imi te..l

as described
1^

oPPedr>

diStrict

in the month of December 2014.

rh^

and decrees,

and

l-ha

Harrell,

..1rrrtq

<

D e c e r n l c e r1 0 , 2 0 1 , 4

^:.aS

court

this
Mr.

court

hnr.rpve--

.ri crri.-

under

court.

in this

13 appeals

^^,,rf

: Leu u r al ry
a n n n rl n il n r Y r r .

cases in

Bankruptcy

the

tL rl .r} n! a c
/ J

^ - h r L ir ^ n . .
LoP - urr

eighr

Mr, Harrell's

I-.-hr.rlrh-^.,

mrrlf inla

l:cr<

--^^-l^
aPPcdtr

notes that

first

will

more than a shot-gun

h>r.l<hin

^h

n:i,

fi

l-ha

j-ha

lihd

r-larlz.c

faa

of the Uniced States Bankruptcy Courc, the United States

Office

ni ^f *i ^r
TJI> LI -LU L

--'-'i

. 1 ^ , r | L,
UUt.rI

-^.\n

rha

E l arranrh

f-i

rnrr

i l- a^rrrl-

nf

Anna:

I e

M r , H a r . r e f. L i s

forewarned thaL he may not appea.L interlocuLory

orders

without

also

ennae

nndcr

l

qylJgqr

recleral

musL do so within
Rule

levied,
f fi rl ri rhr ^
!
Y

,,i +L^,.+

Mr

Now, in

+ hr s
Lr ^

continues

and

l

r,r'irhnrrl-

consideration

e^,rdhr-

l o:rro

JvuYrrr

lL-vn

:nr\pa1

is

uyyrqa

filo

nof

whether

consider
motion

1-n

for

leave

Filpd

to
to

8003tc) .

Accordingly,

frr

shorr'l cl he

FnnaAl

the Notice

'
Harrefl's

not

hnr^tcrrcr

of Appeal fifed

f so o
! s,

h,e
, E

n L rro y
ra r

119
I

wiff

sanctions

be

of any appellate

a final

be

nn

a motion

appeaf

fifed."

fhe

..\rrrf

or

judgmenc,

R.

Leave

m^\r

qfilf

that

a

Bankr.

P,

whether leave

consider
of

for

direct

Fed.

sl- ra-r.rrh

The

H a . r . r e 1 l -h a s n o t

.liel- -ir-f

to

time.

or

order

and Mr.

tl^F

leave

the Court is

appeaf,

appeaf at this

t.his Court wiff

oranrpal

\6

path,

current

i na
rl f , , , Y

Even if

:nnoel

appeaf

:nd

filinn

orde13;

"grant

FOO?

the

co Lhe return

Mr. Harrell's

<rrr-h

si
!f

of the instant

an interfocutorv

rather

on

r
a

feave to

the subjecL order,

appropriate

Order from which he appeals is
but

^f
v!

buL no! Iimited

l-l:rral

Prnnadrr-c

R:nkrttn-nrr

^aUy6htlrajrL,srrL

for

motion

days of encry of

filer

to dismiss

constrained

of

Harreff

Mr.

including
r-^

RrrIp

abusive

deemed an

an appropriate

fourteen

If

8002.

- -r,,
Lr-r-urar

Pdr

filing

rhc

rcr-ord

and

on November L9, 20L4.

Orcier
The Bankruptcy
E x t e n d i-)e: r'l l
Motion to

annea I ecl
i nF

n,al- Fa

'rom
1 .1

Anna,a

denies
l

Mr,

whecher to granr discretionary

In determining
anncal

s

qyysa!

From

J

;

$anl41,rn-n1/

same standard

set

,,lic.rFtionarv

show

nf

Tlnda-

a n n e a ul s! - J

v!

uIJIrr

thaf

l1I

the

is

:m.\n.r .^,rr-s-

hAnkrltrll-

anoeals

1?q2
s

l3)

F

comport with

federaf

a firm

courts

t y v L o . ] v ul !| e
.
vln r

and denies
the

Mr. Harre]l
for

Accordingly,

IT

is directed

r-aqcq

final

r:orsi derat

standard

Clerk

t

\e./r-entional

rerzicrnr fnr

a

o|lesf

i nn

inn

a1low
Tnr-

of

of

the

of the

interlocutory
rr

Lot^trq-

519

Lo S 1292(b) requests woufd
to

reserve

rrcncr^llv

inter.locuLory
'or

re-ainiro

the

.

a.\rrrl- p'.erciSes

itS

discretiOn

appeaf because he has not met
inter.Locutory

discrerionary

that
IS ORDERED

laW

difference

termlnation

judgment rufe.")

feave to

of

i m m e .ii. a t e r e s o l u t l o n

r n r h i1 c

j -h a

1/ 'rrrSt

narf

oround for

design

Congress'

courLS to the
i n.r

fe e
r y 7f v - - n i l l : -

the

which governs

I ino

should

-snarinolrr

USeS

:nncel

-nnl--.r'l

U.S. 61, 14 (7996) ("Routine resorL
hardly

:r

lh'\

the

courts

District

cv

€

advance the ultinate

issue woufd material.Lv
fitiqation,

S L292 (b) '

a srrhstanf ia-

ar.l

COUft

anneals from district

nrc<cnj-

ordcr

r?l rrrrrr whir:h fhere
.rnininn

in

zliStriCL

l-ha

28 U.S.C.

inferlo.-rtorv

..\rr rJ q

forth

..\,rrl-

interlocutory

the

appeal

t o C L O S Et h e c a s e , a n d a I I

a p p e a . I.

be DISMISSED.

The

pending motions are

DENIED AS MOOT.4
4
A / n a_
n rn y ra a

I

On December 1,9, 2014, N],. Harrellr.1

t-h6

E larranrh

airrrri+

a.\rrrr

^f

f il-ed a Notice

Anh^nPPsal - -! D,

-r ^^ s i- ^
c ^P P - la hL - L r r g

of
tL-r1 s. ^
r.

the payment of the filing
December 9, 2014 Order directing
(Doc. No. 7) The Notice of Appeal was accompanied by a
fee.
motion for feave to appeal in forma pauperis and moLion t.o

ORDER ENTERED
January,

crL

^,,^.r-f
r-1u9 uJ

La r

/'^^-^
i\Jc(J!9r4,

I-hi

e

/e{.,

2015.

UNITED STA

S D ] S T R IC T

(Doc. Nos. 8 & 9. ) Because a final judgmenc
appoint counse].
or order had not been entered in this case at that point, Mr.
premature
Harrell's
appeal
is
notice
of
and improper.
Anr-nrrii

nrrl

rr

hie

motion

to

aDDoint

m . ' \ l -i . \ n

counsef

l-.\

nr^-ae.l

in

fnrm;

are DENIED AS MOOT.

n;rrnari

c

rnd