Harrell et al v. Clements et al

Filing 13

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL/CASE. This case is Closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 1/13/15. (cmr)

,rl{ISINAL
i lt_:- il

r:

i'r,icirc0uRl

COI]RT FOR TITE
THE I'NITED STATES DISTRICT
2tl5 i3
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
JAt{
DUBLTN DIVTSTON

IN

pt{3,

l l Lt F i (

!,rTr"iT-F-6I

SARALAND, LLL P,

IN RE:

*

Rr

n le rr rnl-

- ir

L2-30rL3

l\I^

Debtor.

CHAPTER11
TODD BOUDREAUX,
TRUS
TEE,

cv 314-130
Plaintiff,
/ ^ A--^ -^
\nuvc!Dd!y

- -,,

Number in
Ban krupt cy C o u r t : 1 4 03004)

VS.

A. CARTER CLEMENTS. JR. /
BORDEAUX, LLC,

and

Defendants.

ORDER

On December9, 2014, this
W.

^4

:^h^ih-ronr

wo-

motion

Harrefl's

-i.,^h
grvsrr

dismissal

f ^LErr

of

n-,,^
uay.5

the

:h

16
--

for

t

fhie

h q(J'
y:

appeal.

Harre.LI had caused to
"Motion

proceed

to

-^,,^o6l

Extension

Court denied the Appel lant Lisrer

be

in

l-\r-Lr'

l- ha

^f

ranrri

nanamhar

-\/

r o / lu

pauperis

annar

Mr

f r - - r Ir 9 n ^
i
! i

Faa

to

receipt

of

filed

a

"Motion

to

of Time. "'

(Doc. No. 6. )

sinrr'e
ronoirrad

f il

this

av

l€ a n ^
oue

Order,

Produce"

Mr,

and a

Obviousfy,

Mr.

which

innrho

Ior

and
Irr--aII

I

Prior

The mot.ions a r e c o n t a l n e d i n a
?
2014.
The Cferk
December I0, 20L4.

.l r l" a.d

forma

fiI

jg

inn

^.

had the benefit

Harrel-l- had not

the

The Coun

motions.?

of

is

Order prior

Court's
in

filing

these

filing,

dared December 13, 2014, wh-ich contains

include
"Motions

to

Answer

to

"Motions

and

also

Amend afl

t^

to

Appeals, "
"Motion

to

Extend and Continue, "

to

Adversary

ar,rt,"Mot ,on

t-orrnsel .,,

of

a

Produce, "

"Motion

to

Answer and Amend MoLions co Stay and for
and to

of

six molions,

Amend Notj-ce

Answer and Amend Motj-ons to

Answer and Amend Motions

receipr

to

Emergency Injunction

Proceedings, "

nh+^^+

-^hh^nsation

l -^

to

"Motion

Appoint

& PfOCeed

f Fp.',

(Doc. No. 12 . )
The

Court

Iist

f ilings,/motions
rJi erri-t

first

..\rrrf

notes
multiple

:nncals

in

ij-e

have been docketed i-n up to
'urr n u sF rrj l! .r r r i r n
d r
r
r9

r - e! c
uq' v

as

jn

l-h^

Mr.

unaccepcable.
contain

only

^r^-r'r,,

riar'r h^.i^

In his filing
"production"
of,

nr.-1qa.rrl
nnrr'i

h i q

e

an<

ennc;r1

J-hF

i^n:

eiqht

is

courc

cases

ar-r-nrdinrr'lr;

cases in
^t/

directed

rhc

this

nrar-.

his

that

and

filinne

Court

Th js

.^!rrl-

recent

and the
i r-e

Iilings

iS

may

and case number, and he should

fhF

fiIino I rY

should

be

rrr!

made

ej Lher

of December 7A, 2A14, Mr. Harrelf seeks
inter
aJia, 1) instructions
on how to

t'LJqyyLu!,LvggJfY]IqL

-f

r^:nt

one case capcion
,.,hFther

Harrell's

Mr,

bankruptcy

Drnlzrrrn-

HarrelL

2

the

that

rcr-ord

i h-l.l.,li

f.\r

nn

anna^l

+^

hnrr
!

?\

in

.laei.rn^l-a
fnrme

ra

nattaari

larT.ht
<

farmc

3) transcripts
of bankrupccy proceedinqs; 4)
involving
the trusrees
and the bankruptcy
and unfifed
5) al-l- filed
" c o m m u n i c a ti o n s " f r o m M r .
bankruptcy
to
the
court;
and 6)
af l- evidence

and insrruccions;
t ' c o m m u n i c a ti o n s "
court;
Harrell
<nnn.\rt

Harreff
rJ

i n.r

l- ho

hank-rtnt-

a\,, arlrtrj-

seeks an extension

aPIJsa_l,

(Doc. No. 6. )

_Lrrufuufr-y

..t

the

t q

orr]erq

of tlme to
fa i lrrrc

-:nri

nrncoadi

correct

fL v 1
.

nu ]r /
y :

nae

the defects
fho

fi

I i na

Mr

of
Faa

in

this

or the United

Court
Mr.

Court

HarrefL

are courLs

of

^nlrr

described

in

inr,-eas'n.r
1121(d);

-r

(3) aIl

/h)

rn

arde-

r

^

ROnl

ife

irrd.rmani

^n

Mr
c\/ar\7

tina

,A

aoa

q

Il

f'

conorr'l

iS

COUrt

Tn

"

^hi

Frr lf

- |
s

nractice

pnl-Fra.l

h\/

l-ho

llni

l-a.l

th:f

Mr.

Annr.A.h

of the United
-l-

F

over

annFl

ni s1-ri

q

fr^m

€

q?

appea.ls

11

U,S.C.
Ieave
p

tra.4

to
Q?

A

'if

th

of

f ih^l

i,-rati^n

do but
/T'l

S

Rrnl.r

1RQ /r\

l-ha

court

f na

wirh

.hr]

en.l.

?d

lc

this

donrooc

under

r-

thaL

111

,,rn

.nhA.

:nd

I?\

the

court,

orders

II

for

The pracLice

Office

,Q

however,

interlocutory

lqAlal

"One

not be toLerated.
I af a

(2)

this

^n

execute

air

1qq7l

i-1-a.lt

Harral

ar,.lFr

ra

€

^f

nrrior<

ne-io.lq

I \i

and l-eaves nothinq

merits

l-rii

tha

:-::----J_:-1-l:_:_==_=_.!

hAnLrr]ni.lr

the

/^i

irrr'l^mantc

ot.her interlocutory
rn

'

1-\/ha<

in

courts,

As a district
l-hra6

not both.

but

13 appeals

Federal

S 158 (a) (1);

rF.ir.i no

and

^rrar

f i n:l

28 U,S.c.

L-r

Cnnl

i^n

/1\

Courrf

an additional

jurisdiction.

irrri<.li^l-

anrrrr'

Bankruptcy

December 2014.

Iimited

h:c

RrnLrrrni^\/

D

filed

the month of

in

r-^r1ri

has

States

Cnrrrl-

^h.l

i q

r-:rrei

States
e.\.ln

orders

without

:nna:l

rrnriar

also
Fcdcral

musr do so within

aq

rrndr)a

h

Rrrla,.\f

h:r.lehi

l-i rarri

enrry

ty

n

+

r-^r,rt

^h
vrr

I

a^rrr1-

4:

rY

k'i l l

r-l arl"t

Lrr!

Dr^.ad,,ra

rhe

^f

a

States

Avh t
n v ^ u ua r:

l <

'

interfocutory

motion

of

j.ha

the United

appeal

an appropriate

days of

annoa I i ro
v}J},vq

more than a snot-gun

Court.

R:nr.r,rnl-.\'

o'

R:nlrrrrnrrr;

nothing

I'l a\ranf

vear

IaSt

that. he may not

f il-ing

fourteen

nn

qi:f

Bankruptcy

f ha

Harre.LI .is forewarned

is

the

for

l-eave to

aAA?

subject

:nrl

hs

o.rder,

Rufe

^--,
i^,,tir]u
r-a--tuuro-t)i

,d r L rF h u , r f
.,i rv^L

deemed an
levied,
f
! ti fI

inn
f

--Y

Harref .I continues

Mr.

If

8002.

Mr

l

of the insLant

c^rr.rht
-.i

an j-nterfocutory

rather

..'

Iaa\ra

:nneFl

is

consider
motion

f i la

to
to

feave

Ar:r:ordinol rz. -his

tn

shnrrld

\u/

enneal

the Notice
rn

of Appeal filed

AAr-armi

annealc

.rr^.1-F,'l

he

f rn'r

n i n^

a

r^'hol-har

same standard

set

forth

r'licr---j- innarrr

^
i nT-erl .\l-r-l- -\/
! v e q e v ! ) ,

l1)

lhaj-

iha

r-\rda-

(2) over r.rhich there

.

is

Harrel-1 has not
mOtion

a

fOf

r-nrrrt

to

appeal

or: direct

filed."

Cortrf

will

n€

tho

a

distriCt

that

a
P.

Bankr.

leave

rarn-d

:fd

I inn

uSeS

COuftS

.r'rFcf

ground for

the

which governs

an appealjng

rrl-\nt-rnl

a substanLiaf

coult

(
S 1-292 b),

t*nm

"-'lI

i f ^/ , ir
- , - .n- - a r-l ' - - -^-, -tr. Y

f l^a diStrict

ar\na^l s

marr

2014.

f .\ .r1.,?nl- rli</-rarinn:rrr

28 U.S.C.

leave

whether

consider

cj- -Fn-rl- h

fhF

R.

Fed.

on November tgt

^raqF.1-q

judgmenc,

,.ji el- rirt

Under S 7292(b) ,

appeals.

qh^r,J

in

if

or

The

time.

iJ^a

Ieave

clr

be

Lhe Courr rs

order

and Mr.
Erzer

/-.1rr-j-

hankrrnt.\/

cou.rls of

order3;

appeal- be

R00?lcl
vvvJ

l, f €

of any appellare

appeal'

a final

anneal

"grant

- ^ L ,o y
r, ,

will

sanctions

appeal at this

not

r n t ^ r c ' t t . ar

r'i led

nol

whether
for

crrr-h

h^
rrc

Ir9.

Mr. Harrell's

to dismiss

f66
-sc,

f ir r! i! h r 9
r^

to the return

!rtf

wILrr(.JuL

Order from which he appeafs is
but

r

paLh'

current

the

appropriate

and

consideration

constrained

nf

but not limited

H.! !rl
r r u a! r + e

Now, in

^.irmar,f

filer

abusive

including
t-n

fha

on

tO

party
r..n

the

must
..f

laW

difference

The Bankruptcy
Order appeal-ed from denies
Harref .l-'s Moti-on to Extend D e a d l i n e D a t e s t o A p p e a l .

Mr.

of

^mr.rn.r .nrrrtq-

^Prr.! ir nv i, . \ .
v
r
r

courts

District

hankrltbtcv

aooeafs

larr^!urJ-L)i

fl-e

immedi-ate

s n a r i r!o, lYv .
.
r
JPo!

should

comport wjth

rerzi ew

rexceDf

for

!zlvvyvrvrrqr

a firm

federa.l courts
Ilr\-n
vlrv'r

.lrrp r-nnsi derat

for

standard
IT

Accordingly,

whila

i on.

rhe

leave to

Harre]l
a

to

rrt\,.

reserve

crener.ar'\/

a o ] 1r t

interlocutory
v.

^

lswf

t19

J.

-,

interlocutory

rFj-Ainino

er.eIciSeS

for

1-he

itS

discf

etion

appeal- because he has not met

discreLionary

IS ORDERED
that

Clerk is directed

of the

judgment rufe."),

final

vqv

and denies Mr.
the

nascs

ional'

r-^

ll-"

the

to S 1292(b) requests would

design

Congress'

of

termination

afLow

a astre -r! ndr!
ruL
g
r

j.

U.S. 61, 14 17996) (-'Routine resort
hardly

resolution

advance the uftimate

issue would materialfy
fitigation.

f?)

end

the

incerlocutory

appeal.

appeal- be DISMISSED.

t o C L O S Et h e c a s e , a n d a l l

The

pending motions are

DENIED AS MOOT..
ORDER ENIERED at

Augusta,

Georgia,

this

/ZrG ",

Lv!J

aaLLuaLyt

UNITED STA

a
A yLqt
n yn n o r ' l

On December 19,
t"^

fha

trl

arrAni-h

2014, Mr.

/-ir^,ri+

^^,-rl-

Harrelf
^F

filed

^hha^l
l-1PlreulJ,

e

a Notice
rnna:lih^

of
l-ha

December 9, 2014 order directing
the payment of the filing
(Doc. No. 7,)
The Notice of Appeal was accompanied by
fee.
a motion for feave to appeaf in forma pauperis and motion to
(Doc. Nos. I & 9. ) Because a final judgment
appoint counse] .
or order had not been entered ln this case at that point, Mr.
premat.ure and jmproper,
Harrelf's
norice
of
is
appeal
Anaarr ' n
n L L U ! u t! i' ny ! lj r r

motion

to

hic

appolnt

nnrinn

counsel

lL v , r
-,

n nnoo^
y lru s s E v

in

F^-mLvL)ua

are DENIED AS UOOT.

^-.,-a-.,^
PauP.r

^^^