Harrell et al

Filing 15

ORDER denying as moot 7 Motion for Extension of Time; 7 Motion to Produce; 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel; and 13 Motion. Further, denying 9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The instant appeal is dismissed and this case is closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 1/26/15. (cmr)

Download PDF
ORIGINAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COI'RT TOR SOUTHERNDISTRICT OF GEORGIA DT'BIIN DIVISION i lL{c I i . i i r r i - i t ; t I { _ . O iU R ll rr :C ! rr1/ 'jrY. !; THE 2015 2o AH I 0 iAii t0: CLTft :0\F,5T0Ftd IN RE: PARADISE FARMS, INC., * Ranlzrrrnl--ir 12-3011"1 Nl^ Debt or . LISTER W. HARRELL; SARALAND, L L L P ; a n d P A R A D I S EF A R M S , I N C . cv 314-134 Plaintiffs, /Adrrare:rrr ltl,rmhar i n Bankruptcy Court: vs. 14-03010) NIKK] HARRELL ULLIS; BRETT M CO],EMAN;SID CARTER; SARA HARRELL; DONALDHE],MS; and LYNN SHEFFIELD, a1^€^-^^-+ ^ ORDER Mr. qr rl- Ac diernicc and Li-ster Rrntzrrrnr :n W. Harrel-l nrr Saraland. LLLP r-asc hank rrtnrr-v Farms, Inc. - q^lll- a^!1rt- :drrarc:r.z purporcedly appeafs the nror-ccd two ino entities a ah^nj-ar D, i- wh i.:h of Paradise and is harh c - - !. i - L ^ - * e was which Farms. 7 decision fi he Inc.' n-nnc.odr no of ^F OI lecl is the .^^r^i LreUIqf hv United d, tO N4r_ frarre-L-l a The introl\/incl principaf, underfying Parad'Se Bankruptcy Case No. 12-30111 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 29, 1 There is no indication that either the Chapter 11 Trustee for Sarafand, LLLP or Lhe Chapter 7 T-rust.eefor Paradise Farms, Tnc. had authorized the filing of the adversary proceeding on hehalf ot lhFir resnective entities. l 201.2) . The Bankrupccy Court dismissed the adversary p.roceeding on 5, September 20L4, filing required fee and his rules applicable the 5, rnnal forms and fi notice a filed I :ta faiLure Case No. 14-03010. ) Bankr. Harrell Harre.II's failure for l i na of pay to f i1.i ng an adversary 17, 201,4, Bankr. Doc. On September 24, appeal, the conform to t.o suostantiafly (See Show Cause Order of July proceeding. No. Mr. upon buL he 2414, Mr. pay the Report and noc did faa On December 9, 20I4, this Court the adopted R e c o m r n e n d a t i o no f t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s B a n k r u p t c y C o u r t d e n y i n g M r . Hrrral l in farma natrnari lrr o n frl r i Ys e rarl f i I i nrr In cl- :t- rre a^ ^ ^- l rcr- On December 19, 2AI4, Mr. Harrell to rhe ElevenLh Circuit Ot J ?n -A Z Q1 \ No. 'I a v It !4] ^ r! E e:rre rn innea_ in i-hA of hr('hanr Appeal forma (Doc. Nos. 9 & 10.) rtattn. Because a final anne:l anri Harrelf in chis Court thar 1-h6 fi of of Appeal Faa lr\r \-JC. a motion l-.\:nnain- Mr. Harrefl's other he does not hal acq appeals plan for r-nr.rqef judgment or order Ne-zcrf file Lhe December l ina by of -lnna^l a Notice mr.lii.ln point. imnronnr. case and the muftitude from this ^f ri s:nal case at that nrema-rrrc fjled l-ha lnas accompanied been entered in this i s n "f , Len days ro CourL of AppeaIs, appealing d]iI I C joLn r i h d r \ The Norice 8.) same Order this Court gave Mr. Harrell. December 9, 2014, rhis r h .a e. L < had noL notice i l- . i < filed Lo pay the of n146a by Mr. filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS t ORDEREDhat the instant appeal be DISMISSED.' IT IS IT'RTHERORDERED, in Appef-LaceProcedure 4(a) (2), to the Eleventh enrry of without this merit; forna pauperis Cir:cuit order. is deemed filed the (3). therefore Federal Rufe of Not'ice of Appeal as of the date of this appeal Mr. HarreLI's (doc. no. S f9f5(a) with Lhat Mr. HarreII's Funher, accordingly, on appeal accordance is frivofous ano motion to proceed in 9) is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. (doc. DENIED AS MOOT. The motion to oRDER ENTERED at uatLu.lLy, appoint Augusta, counsel Georgia, 10) is this zwLJ. UNITED STA '! no. S DISTRICT JU T h e C l e r k i s d i r e c t e d t o C L O S Et h e c a s e ; M r . H a r r e l l ' s motion for extens.ion of time and motion to produce, fifed on December 14, 20L4, and che multiple miscellaneous motions fiLed on January L3, 20L5, are DENIED AS MOOT.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?