Harrell et al
Filing
15
ORDER denying as moot 7 Motion for Extension of Time; 7 Motion to Produce; 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel; and 13 Motion. Further, denying 9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The instant appeal is dismissed and this case is closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 1/26/15. (cmr)
ORIGINAL
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COI'RT TOR
SOUTHERNDISTRICT OF GEORGIA
DT'BIIN DIVISION
i lL{c
I
i . i i r r i - i t ; t I { _ . O iU R
ll
rr
:C ! rr1/
'jrY.
!;
THE
2015 2o AH I 0
iAii
t0:
CLTft
:0\F,5T0Ftd
IN RE: PARADISE FARMS, INC.,
*
Ranlzrrrnl--ir
12-3011"1
Nl^
Debt or .
LISTER W. HARRELL; SARALAND,
L L L P ; a n d P A R A D I S EF A R M S , I N C .
cv 314-134
Plaintiffs,
/Adrrare:rrr
ltl,rmhar
i n
Bankruptcy Court:
vs.
14-03010)
NIKK] HARRELL ULLIS; BRETT
M
CO],EMAN;SID CARTER; SARA
HARRELL; DONALDHE],MS; and
LYNN SHEFFIELD,
a1^€^-^^-+
^
ORDER
Mr.
qr
rl- Ac
diernicc
and
Li-ster
Rrntzrrrnr
:n
W. Harrel-l
nrr
Saraland.
LLLP
r-asc
hank rrtnrr-v
Farms, Inc.
-
q^lll-
a^!1rt-
:drrarc:r.z
purporcedly
appeafs the
nror-ccd
two
ino
entities
a
ah^nj-ar
D, i-
wh i.:h
of
Paradise
and
is
harh
c - - !. i - L ^ - *
e
was
which
Farms.
7
decision
fi
he
Inc.'
n-nnc.odr no
of
^F
OI
lecl
is
the
.^^r^i
LreUIqf
hv
United
d,
tO
N4r_ frarre-L-l
a
The
introl\/incl
principaf,
underfying
Parad'Se
Bankruptcy Case No. 12-30111 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 29,
1 There is no indication
that either the Chapter 11 Trustee
for Sarafand, LLLP or Lhe Chapter 7 T-rust.eefor Paradise Farms,
Tnc. had authorized the filing
of the adversary proceeding on
hehalf
ot
lhFir
resnective
entities.
l
201.2)
.
The Bankrupccy Court dismissed the adversary p.roceeding on
5,
September
20L4,
filing
required
fee and his
rules
applicable
the
5,
rnnal
forms
and
fi
notice
a
filed
I :ta
faiLure
Case No. 14-03010. )
Bankr.
Harrell
Harre.II's
failure
for
l i na
of
pay
to
f i1.i ng
an
adversary
17, 201,4, Bankr. Doc.
On September 24,
appeal,
the
conform to
t.o suostantiafly
(See Show Cause Order of July
proceeding.
No.
Mr.
upon
buL
he
2414, Mr.
pay
the
Report
and
noc
did
faa
On December 9,
20I4,
this
Court
the
adopted
R e c o m r n e n d a t i o no f t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s B a n k r u p t c y C o u r t d e n y i n g M r .
Hrrral
l
in
farma
natrnari
lrr o n frl r i
Ys e
rarl
f i I i nrr
In
cl- :t- rre
a^
^ ^- l
rcr-
On December 19, 2AI4, Mr. Harrell
to rhe ElevenLh Circuit
Ot
J
?n -A
Z Q1 \
No.
'I
a
v It !4] ^ r!
E
e:rre
rn
innea_
in
i-hA
of
hr('hanr
Appeal
forma
(Doc. Nos. 9 & 10.)
rtattn.
Because a final
anne:l
anri
Harrelf
in
chis
Court
thar
1-h6
fi
of
of Appeal
Faa
lr\r
\-JC.
a motion
l-.\:nnain-
Mr. Harrefl's
other
he does not
hal acq
appeals
plan
for
r-nr.rqef
judgment or order
Ne-zcrf
file
Lhe December
l ina
by
of
-lnna^l
a Notice
mr.lii.ln
point.
imnronnr.
case and the muftitude
from this
^f
ri s:nal
case at that
nrema-rrrc
fjled
l-ha
lnas accompanied
been entered in this
i s
n "f
,
Len days ro
CourL of AppeaIs, appealing
d]iI I C joLn r i h d
r
\
The Norice
8.)
same Order
this
Court gave Mr. Harrell.
December 9, 2014, rhis
r h .a
e. L
<
had noL
notice
i l-
.
i <
filed
Lo pay the
of
n146a
by Mr.
filing
fee.
Accordingly,
IT
IS
t
ORDEREDhat
the
instant
appeal
be
DISMISSED.'
IT
IS IT'RTHERORDERED, in
Appef-LaceProcedure 4(a) (2),
to
the Eleventh
enrry
of
without
this
merit;
forna pauperis
Cir:cuit
order.
is
deemed filed
the
(3).
therefore
Federal
Rufe of
Not'ice of Appeal
as of the date of this
appeal
Mr. HarreLI's
(doc. no.
S f9f5(a)
with
Lhat Mr. HarreII's
Funher,
accordingly,
on appeal
accordance
is
frivofous
ano
motion to proceed in
9) is DENIED.
See 28 U.S.C.
(doc.
DENIED AS MOOT.
The motion to
oRDER ENTERED at
uatLu.lLy,
appoint
Augusta,
counsel
Georgia,
10) is
this
zwLJ.
UNITED STA
'!
no.
S DISTRICT JU
T h e C l e r k i s d i r e c t e d t o C L O S Et h e c a s e ; M r . H a r r e l l ' s
motion for extens.ion of time and motion to produce, fifed
on
December 14, 20L4, and che multiple miscellaneous motions fiLed
on January L3, 20L5, are DENIED AS MOOT.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?