Walker v. Colvin

Filing 5

ORDER directing the plaintiff to amend any documents needed to clarify Plaintiff's residence so that this Court may assess whether it has jurisdiction over this action. Plaintiff is allowed 7 days to amend. (Compliance due by 12/1/2014). Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/24/14. (cmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION PATRICIA C. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) _________ CV 314-136 ORDER _________ Plaintiff filed the above-captioned social security case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) in the Dublin Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. Plaintiff’s complaint states that she is a resident of Sandersville, Johnson County, Georgia. (See doc. no. 1, p. 2; doc. no. 1-1, p. 1.) However, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis states she is a resident of Wrightsville, Johnson County, Georgia. (Doc. no. 2, p. 5.) § 405(g) provides that an action seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security “shall be brought in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides.” Wrightsville and Johnson County are located in this Division, however Sandersville is located in the Macon Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. Therefore, it is unclear where Plaintiff resides and, thus, whether this Court has jurisdiction over her complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiff has seven days from the date of this order to amend any documents to clarify Plaintiff’s residence so that this Court may assess whether it has jurisdiction over this action. SO ORDERED this 24th day of November, 2014, at Augusta, Georgia. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?