Ezzard v. Ajibade et al

Filing 33

ORDER denying 31 Motion for Recusal. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 1/22/15. (cmr)

IGINAL
OR

'';fi'rff*

FoRrtjps

TIIE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT
OF GEORGIA
SOUTIIERN DISTRICT
DUBLIN DIVISION

IN

t0[ JAil p 2:95
f2

STEVE HUGH EZZARD/

CLERK

Plaintiff,

c v 3 1 4- 1 4 1
and BRAD HOOKS,

DR. AJIBADE

Defendan1- s .

ORDER

.\h

--h.r-

1n

r.-

Dl >i

nr- i Ff

nznnaorl

i n.r

n,.i-r ea

i n

l-hi

s

"n1\

prisoner

civi.l

rights

no.
).\

^slr'rn

ho

<tr:ra

. - Tr rr 1 ' ^ r a

in

31) and an affidavit

Mani

144 and S 455.

^a.r\r
Pd_!/

t ^v
L

outcome

nanninn

affidavit
hrc

favor

irrrlno

,-.i<r
j

<h>1

:

an

of
I

narq.'\n:

di

ri-r

a-

by

hi:c

a judge

i frr

h

As

mrrq-

:nd

nn

nzoirr.lieo

party.
himcal

lro

hev

the

inn

^n

Id.

f

in

l-^

!q

,ln\/

324,

+ l-^

nrnnaad

^red.
sten

,idaincl-

to
inn

S

lll-l
when

,.
'y

---r
orlu

whom the matter

Pursuant

,".i

321

hlmself
-

rrrq>

aiihar

(lucJL!u,.

norqn-:l

28 U.S,C.

must recuse

nranaa.-l
P-v-LLu-r-.g

nr

acrion

sracutes,

the judge before

that
I

i/-a

this

Monaco, 350 Fed. Appx.

L

(doc. no.

motion

case.

Lwo federal

r L q ' rJr ,
, :hr
the

his

nr,.-irrri

the

-^ttr|

-LrrrPar rrorrLy

q Fl

of

from

former,

adverse

earr:l

support

hi:c

of

Johnson v.

.
e

sufficient

in

l-^

2OO9). Under the

Cir.
.
d

drrc

Ls governed

Recusa-

a t'rnotion to -recuse" (doc.

.-rnno

tis-.j^

the

in

interest

f 'led

case,

is

him

nr

S 455(a) ,
in

r ^ r hi r - h

lcl . under
ffom

an

a

h ic

ei Lher
extfa-

qr-\rrr.o

irrr'l ir-i:l

insufficient
ch^r^, irn

T.l

to

nr

Cnnspnrronr

demonstrate

.ar'/a<:\/a

Rufes of

pro

Plaintiff's

case pursuant

r1-.r

r1--

r r a g fi f4^^

interest
o-ai*-rfa

outcome

-hosa

srnnrrr-

-.\

--WO

on

of

shovr-cause proceeding

After

concurred
dismissed
)q
4J.I

\

Plaintiff's
is

affegations
show

thar

from
--:i--:fFq,

an

zr1,

despite

Lo

d_sm_ss
insists

L t -,
r ,.t^ u w. .,L e ^ r g ^
( ^te

(Doc.

case.//

9,

ir

; gu' rirn t-vrr <
r
I

?0I4,

Plaintiff's

^dtI

d\ l. r. l] t

no.

31. )

->qa

fhie

the
motion

for

Maq.istrate

to
in

'
ut

extraj udicial

for

an

emergencv

.ludqe's

.utJr

1-^

those

^

to

Lo

no other
rrqs

sou.rce.

J__

(Doc. no,

(Doc.

qlnrr

cr Per -

COJTLTS

(Doc.

the Court

id.

rUli*os.

. T ,u y L a
uu rdd

u_L

rj-

JuIJIJvI

facts

See

.

reconrmendation and

complaint,

OrderS

u u!rg<

With

t"tdgf

Judqe

emersencv

rellef

objections.

Ltttj

amend his

and he polnts
N4aoist'-

Magistrate

de novo rev.iew of the fife/

,Tanrr-.-.. y

..\1-h"1.r

A:

ProcedLre,

^:^:-_cr.l_r
Juuf

adverse

and motion

the

motion

lhe

a

sL.r_crly

RuLes. Plaintiff

the motions over Pfaintiff's
-.

absent

LhreaLening

this

recent

a careful

with

q6--^^l
JcLUrru

Therc

is

owt

of

December

reconmended denial

no.22.)

rra

Fflations.

a

First,

impartiality

Civil

those

\\hre

the

r"

and

to

uT ru jr r. i a a
u r

nninte

'

'

sraLus,

.^r^
-L!oLq

in

rlnna

LhaL Lhe Maq.isLraLe J .dge is

P . a i n r -i i [ ' s

se

rrrlina<

Jd.

Lo Lhe l-ederal

aoherjng

:r{rrarca

a court/s

biaS.

P.a'nl j l-i staLes

lrr

P

in

the

I

hi:e

dania.i

no.

28.)

ai.^-i-€,c

record

to

cr6mmin^

(holding
wi-hnrr*

tha r
rr.o

ro oenonstraLe judic_al

was insulf-cient
orottnds

for

ror_

rqal

of

irrdae

:n'_l

bias or prejudice

m:niqrr:l-a

in

n !i v, r, ri l
L

as

r ; r^Yh 1 - e r
r
L

!

actaon )
I T I S T H E R E F O R EO R D E R E Dt h A t
(doc.

no.

31)

is

motion to recuse

DENIED.

ORDERENTEREDat Augusta/
January,

PfAiNtiff'S

Georgia,

this

zn(^,_",

2015

UN]TED STAT

D]STRICT JUDGE