In re: Saraland, LLLP

Filing 4

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL/CASE. This case is closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 1/14/15. (cmr)

.'FIfiINAL

ir:lil
'5
ii' ft'

u . s i , i , ! ' i i t i cIl
IN THE I'NITED STATES DISTRICT COT'RT FOR rHE
SOUTHERNDISTRICT OF GEORGIA
DT'BLIN DIVISION

20iiJAf{ P
lI

iLI n
TTTD

SARALAND,

]N RE:

.K

*
*

Debtor.

Case No. 3L4-]'44
( B a n k r . C a s e N o . 1 2- 3 0 1 1 3

ORDER

Mr, Lister

on December 3,20L4,
of

in

appeal

rrnnlar'l

rrinn

p:radi

qa

United

the

ahrnt-ar

F:*mq
/S

1^-?n111

n

?

r;^

sj xth

Rr : - k r! . - iq\y t . \e r v l ,
!u
r ^

f-r\rrri's

:'qo

2AI4,

nhier--i

anncals
nn

-o

which

\

"n121

\'^ The

this

case,
Ra.r-.ri

l-/-l

7?9.

is

:nnninl-menr

of

R:nkr^f

and

che

---,,r,

dohrn'

aase

NO.
\.4r.

annc:l

of

Mr.

from

the
Of

Harreff's

Doc. No. 762.)

counSeL

LiS

,-lerrriro

C)rdp-

Cou-r's

in

ReCOnunendatiOn

(Bankr.

sner-ial

iha

taken

recommends denial

Barkrttnl- r-v

CourE

nn- i^a

forma oauperj s.

thc

fhe

n^-

waI l-rorq.nnod

requesL co proceed in
Ha

?q

Mar

ncrf:ininrr

a:nLv

appea-L in

Harrelf's

November 18,

/aaa

nn

a norice

filed

Bankruptcy

States

nrnnaadi

Tn.

W. Harreff

in

t.he

case.

(Bankr. Doc. No. 763. )

1 The NoLice of Appeal is dated and signed on November 27,
2AI4, and postmarked December I, 2014; it. is therefore timeLy.
Adams v. United States, 113 F.3d 1339, 1341 {11r5 Cir.
1999)
-hc

rm:ilhnv

1'\rln.ior
'ie
l-hc

d:tc

nrisor

aDt-horiiics

Avn n ?
J v-

/-\
\e/

/1\
\r/

:

nr

laffaar
\L!!LeLr

rrr-F

iqnner

f.)r
i r rr ^
c

dcl

t

j-ha

irrcrq

rJ(:\-.

1

!t

.\f

,a

r n ai t j r o - . ,
-^-

dal-a

Lvt+

naj- if

1:

see
)

.

Filina
inn

nr

wilh
nthor

a_LSo Fed.

R,

f l^c

..rtf

L

filinrr

l^

Bankr.

p.

T h !a
r /r

^I r u !n a ^ l f
u J\
u

two reasons.
Q^n^rt-

<

r"rir hnrr-

.anl-i

'ra-rtrr

nra.l

<t.r-

rrc

f /-\ Mr

-f

navne1l-

yu)i'L'rrre

mUSt

be

--r-r

H:rralI

rFfl

fhF

-r

anal .leniecl
n-\.

fili-o

Nr.

fca

/R:nlzr

isile

dismisSed

fOf

Court adopted the

on December 9, 2A14. this

First,

Ra..)mmer.r-! i ^-

^r.'l

^."^^ri
ll9-9-!S-!-+..:z

j-hiq

irr

fhic

in
\

7q1

forma
-hrrc

'rrSC

Annael

be dismissed.
Second, federal
As a districl

courts
this

court,

rt y lrJn o vc u y y l qn Jf J v v Yr |n tn ar r lv '
r va !
l
L vr L

c

frnm

iha

i nt 6-ln/-rr1- -rrr
vuuLv!y

11 U.S.C.

under

with

ordeis

I q

:nnc:

syy!s+r

over three

R^nLrrrnl-

irrdnmontq

28 U.S.C. S 158(a).
rhe

ends

A final

IiIioation

HarreIl

ai

thor

described

irs

ludgment. "

.
o? /.1 rn .i -.

1 9 9 7)

raLher

.Ieave to appeaf js

.rran'

/"\r

nn. i r-c n'

danrr

\t

ancl

Harrelf

ln

r

anneal

Fed.

court

R.

is "one
for

Fulton,

111

The ReporL and
is

not

order;

such appeal.

ee

S

nothin.r

re

an inter.Iocutory

not filed,

n4[g

See qenerally

Iearres

appeals

nori

U.S.C.

28

(c.itacion omitted) .

has noc soughL l-eave Lo file

-he

in

order in a bankruptcy

execute

mav \\f re^f

l- i'no

12)

interlocutory

P. 8001(b) & 8003.

to do bur

judgmenc, but

- ho

other

merits

motion for
...rrr-

all

the

or

f in:l

nn

re.ltr-i

(3)

as

Recommendation from which Mr.
order

11\

on

rhe courL
r ?n o,

or

court,

of

l^nrtrr.

in 28 U.S.C. S 158(a) (1);

and

158(a) (3) and Fed. R. Bankr.

fh.ai

.\/

inr--easind

S 1121(d);

feave

jurisdicLion.

of Iimited

Court only has jurisdiction

as described

and decrees,

orders.

are courts

a final
and Mr.

Even if

a

however, the district
a mocion

Bankr.

f or

P.

leave

and

8004(d)

chis

Accordj ngly,
shnrr'l rj he

rlranf e.l

^ !F
v

f i

Ah^a.I

, ryyvq+

Ih

anncal
oPPUU

rr

'l

arl

Court will

^rr

na,^am^ar

A6farmininn

'ro'n

s

cj- -an.il-l^ /-\r rhF

l-hc

on

rrhathar

vu,'I\!qyLsi

)n1

f l^a

interl^.'l-^r\r:nnaalq

-L--

^L-.-

t)\
\

-

/

/-\

r Lr ^
Lr E

\!/

. \ \ r ^ r , , ' hi . . h
v

v

v !

nnininn

c

^moro

llnaar

^-.lar

would mater:iaffy

issue

bankruptcv

appeals

\vt

A

{il

thtr

sparinglv.

federal

fnr

\awnantinn:l'r:ecc

courts

a firm

Upon due consideration,

CourL

already

r h - . \ r r / - r h +i L J e ^v.v 1/ ^ n fL r vi ^ n
f
e
l

oround

la

to

-r-Y

n r r t \ /L
vq!

OttaSr iOr
\:lu!JLfe-r

for

m ', u r- L
rL , f

r)f'aW
-/
v!

di fference

resofution

affow

j

of

of
Lhe

of the

lnterfocutory

fnc.

v,

Lewis,

519

to S 1292(b) requests wou-Id
reserve

nonarr

l l !r

int-er.Locutory

r6i-:ininn

fnr

tho

.
its

discretion

appeal because he has not met
interfocutory

aff i-rmed the
^r.r^*

nn

the Court exercises

leave

Lhe

COUITS tO the

termination

judqment rule.")

the standa.rd for a discretionary
rhis

rP JL :r
q n ln a o l i

r - ^ r j - r O+l - - rl ..\ r n
v
l

desi gn to
u,hi

final

and denies Mr. Harrell

:t
o nt

Cacerpillar

hard-Ly comport wit.h Congress'
i aur

,

shoufd

courts

USeS

COUrt

irnmerliate

U.S. 61, 74 (L996) ("Routine resorL

rorr

rti StriCt

advance the uftimate

District

litigation,

1l-'\

A srrhsl-anrial
and

cnrrrf s-

1?q?

y!srs

is

i ^n:rr.'

f rn.n diSCriCt

r\rFsantq

v!qs!

i-hcra

€

NOLiCe

the

S 1292(b) , which governs

28 U.S.C.

d,qcrelion:rv

: I I La
u nr nra : lt J

in

and

i
ar
- _ , - .n.r - - -l- - n n r-r-t n y
-- r

dierral-

/-^,,r1-

set

reCOrd

co appeal

A

r'ranf

same standard

a!f
v

forth

?

i.\

$ . 1 p 1 6 r . r n r -n . /

2

whether leave

consider

rnnarrii

appeaf be DISMISSED. The Cl-erk is

Report
nnr ',

IT

directed

appeaL
and
Is

ln facLl

Recommendation
oRDERED that

Lhe

t o C L O S Et h e c a s e .

^nd

el I

nencli n.r 'nof iOnS

ORDER ENTERED at
January,

AIE DENIED AS MOOT.
11u9u-La,

-

^^^__]-

usw!9ra'

*his

2015.

UNITED STAT