Boudreaux et al v. Clements et al

Filing 4

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL/CASE. This case is closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 1/14/15. (cmr)

,jt?tslf\|AL

f r*r-D

t . S . i :, 'l': i l , i l i C O U R ' I
'
r qr i i f l l V ,

IN TIIE I'NITED STATES DISTRICT COIJRT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SOUTHERN
Iq
ZOI5JAHP
DT'BLIN DIVTSIOIiI

iLEiI
]N RE: SARALAND, LLLP,

s i N , s r c FG A

Bankruptcy No. 12-301-13
Debt or .

CHAPTERI1
TODD BOUDREAUX,
TRUSTEE,
cv 314-146
Plaintiff,
( A d v e r s a r y Number in
Bankruptcy Court:14-03004)
A . C A R T E RC L E M E N T S ,J R . ,
BORDEAUX,LLC,

and

Defendant s .

ORDER

nn
nf
qt:i

na/-amha.

anneal
aa

in

?

lhe

Ra:rn L ^ !r r n r /L-L\ r
u
r r
uv

'^1

'4

t,'nrr

|lna]a-l

y

tr'-

a-^rrrl-

"
:drrcrqar\/

/cae

R:nlzr

N o . 1 4 - 0 3 0 0 4 ( S . D . G a . M a y L 5 , 2 0 14 ) . )
thc

q^nkr-rrnj- -\r

of November I8,
request

'

a / - \ r r r - ' q r ^ r c lI - - a a q n n c d

llarre_L]
-rr

nr^-aFdi
n/r/-

NT^

forma pauperis.r

-l

rf

1q

a
tha

Rrnlzr

nocice
llnif

ed

r-rc^

The appeal is taken from
Ranol.t

and

2014, which recorunends deniaf

to proceed in

f iled

ReCOmmendation

of Mr. Harref]'s

( B a n k r . D o c . N o . - l. 1 5 .)

The Nocice of Appea] is daLed and signed on November 27,
2014, and postmarked December I, 2014; it. is rherefore timely.
Adams v. United States,
1.13 E.3d 1339, 1341 (11rn Cir.
1,999)
("Under the rmai.Lbox rule,'
the date of filing
with the courc

l'ha

:nna:

I

Lwo reasons.

in

1-hic

/^Anti

nnc|

narrer

on December 9, ZOLA, this

First,

Report

and Recommendarion as irs

nirnari
ll-9-!lll!+-+jl

c

wirhn,rf

qr- rl- ,re

F^

^a\rmanf

Mr

.\f

uutr.LvrrL

mUSt

Llrrral

l-ha

opinion

I

ran J Li
r u Y urf r ir q e l

frrinn
!ilf

fOr

CourE adopted the

n/1/-

NI.\

foo
-uu,

rrY

diSmiSSed

in

and denied

/Ranlzr

-a

be

lL-r h fi e
r

1?1

forma
'Thrr^

I

a ynI n U a fl
u
J a:

a

mL u J L
r. rr^+

be dismissed.
q6.^-,,1
A< :

far"lar:l

rt:qf

rr.f

nf

rnnor

r r /rI nva v !
gj
J Jc

.-^rrri
l e

.\.rrt-rrr\/

Frnm

iha

orders

with

q

i nr-rcaqi

S 1121(d);

feave

of

28 U.S.C. S 158(a).

the

an.is rhc

Iifioation

F.3d 92, 93 (11

'

Cir.

^.

irr.l-rmanf

ln)

l1I

a1l

l^f

f a.-r

irra

other

judgment."

to

28

nds

U. S.C.

court

is

"one

Fulton,

.

L,

. v L aA.\
^1 t
.

'lLL

The Reporc and
is

nor

/1r\/ ^r.{ar.

such appeaf.

a final
:n-l

M-

Even if

a

however, the discrict

deljvers
a petition
o r o r h e r f i I i nn
maiIing.");
see afso Fed. R. Bankr.
-

n6^

S

See qenerallv

In re

appeals

i n t e r l O / v-uru.L fv ! y
!

file

ncri

interfocutory

in

omiLL.ed).

HarreIl
an

(2)

and leaves nothi nrr for

on the merits

leave

th.ree

irrrlamanr-.

. ime

the

described

leave Lo appeal -is not filed,

is Lhe daLe a prisoner
prison authorities
for
R0O?

(3)

no

order in a bankruptcy

raCher

Harre-Ll has noL sought
moLjon for

redrtci

1997) (citation

hUt

f inr'l

P. 8001(b) & 8003.

R e c o m m e n d a t . i o nf r o m w h i c h M r .
rr4c'r

nr

as

execute its

courL to do but

/1t

oVeI

in 28 U.S.C. S 158(a) (I);

and

A final

i r : r i s c l i r -1 -i o n ,

iurisdiction

r-n,rrr.

nn

court,

I initeci

of

onl rr has

R:nlzn,^1..!/

158(a) (3) and Fed. R. Bankr.

fhar

courts

as described

innFe

11 U.S.C.

under

are

1-hi s Corrrf

and decrees,

orders,
i ^.crl

courts

1 -n

P.

. v^ nu-! f
L

mF\/ .'f rcaf

grant

either

or

be

deny
Court

$riII

oranted

Tn .latarmi

annc^

s

fron

J

r

ni nrr r^rhethar

a

set

r l i s r - - a t e 4 vi rovnj a - v
r r

inf.erl.)-nf

of

l2)
\ - /

{1)

f be

l-r:-krrnf

nr\/

anneals

nrcccntq

i q

/-.\r,rt- c

courts

/?)

S 1292(b),

Court

N O Ci C e

Congress'

a firm

final

inc

ar6gn6l

termination

I lar

T-r-

Harreff

leave to

afready

affirmed

nf

14g2

OI

Of
Lhe

of the

interlocutory
rr

T,ewis-

519

Lo S 1292(b) requests would

design

rhe

must

differenCe

reSOlUtiOn

allow

Lhe

Lo Lhe

parly

rrrrccf inr

fOr

irradi3lg

Lo reserve

judgment rule./')

ion.

USeS

which governs

an appealing

should

resort

i
a l . i '
- .n.t- -r -.-\ -r-r ---. -\r y

coufLS

districL

./-\nf rrI

Carcrni

rhe sIandard for a discreLionary
rhis

.l^a

courts

^q,v r 6 ^ ^ n - i A 6 r a l v

and denies Mr.

the

COUrt

'excepciona-Lr cases while generally

review for

r vrv-r r^ h
u

a

snarinrrirr-

comport with

federal

diStriqt

frnn

qrrlrqtenf i a1

U.S. 61, 14 (L996) ("Routine
hardly

8004 (d) .

and

nn.arrr

advance the uftimate

District

r-rr anneals

e

:nd

issue would material-lv
litigation.

and

leave co appeal

record

r'li enroti

1n 28 U.S.C.

ordar

rr\7cr wl^i r-h there
:m.\n.I

.rr^n1-

Under S 1292(b),

v v v !

nyn ri r n ir ar n '
v t
v

l-^

i-he

forth

appeals.

q r r n r ^ r- h a f

whether

feaVe

P.

Bankr.

- hc

nf

fOf

a motion

R.

consider

hank-rrnr-

same standard

courrs

Fed.

qj-rerrri- h

i hF

on

eq

on December 3, 2074.

o[ Appeaf filed

qI,yEq

^nna^l

iL."

this

Accordingly,
shorr'l d

n-j- i,^a.f

fhe

rlql,

L

inLerlocutory

relaining

for che

.

{-nrrri- axercises

its

discretion

appeaf because he has not met
inter]ocutory
the

ReporL

appeal.
and

fn fact,

Recommendarion

-hrn

rnh

Lrr!vuYrr

i-s

^.lclnf ion

nrder

Ann67r,1r..r1\/-

appeal be DISMISSED. The Cferk
and all

pendinq

motions

ORDER ENTERED at
ra.rLttrc1Ly'

is

IT

IS

dlrected

ORDERED
that

t o CI.OSE the

are DENIED AS MOOT.
Augusta,

Georgia,

this

LwtJ.

UNITED STATE

the

case.