Boudreaux et al v. Harrell et al

Filing 4

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL/CASE. This case is closed. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 1/14/15. (cmr)

Download PDF
:iiiirif$AL l:"r'--D u . ' - . , r : ' ti l C i r j 0 U R ; IN THE T'NITED STATES DISTRICT COT'RT FOR T H E SOUTHERNDISTRICT Or. GEORGIA Z0i5 itr JAil DT'BLIN DIVISION ]IY, ,:rtnr;$ffi SARALAND, LLL P, IN RE: tr:n kr,-nt- r-\' Nl-' 1?-?n113 Debtor. for T O D D B O U D R E A U XT r u s t e e , Sar:aland, LLLP, cv 314-L48 Plaintiff, /A.i\Tarcrri/ Nlrrmhor i n B a n k r u p t c y C o ur L : I 3 * 0 3 0 0 5 ) vs. LISTER HARRELL; N]KK] HARRELL a,/ k,/a NIKKI MINCEY d,/b,/a ANd PLANTATIONMANAGEMENT, INC. / PLANTAT]ONMANAGEMENT, Defendant s ORDER On December 3,2014, ^. uI ^^^^-l dppYdr States -la6 ih , rrn ^ . a c - lr y - rrrrv i u r{lr r' Mr. Lister na nracaodinn I/!uLEEufrrv l-hF 29, Mr. Harre-l.l's zv t.) t nf a noL-ice t-ha Ihe --! dtt\) request Notace ot *^^!*-1.^l LlLrar J\c!,4 P\,J to proceed in AnnarI h^^^mh^r ic The appeal r^ralI -reasonecl a.rrrt,q Rankrltnr-.\r 2013). ) Recommendation of November 18, 2A!4, ' fjled rThi ia-l Bankruptcv Court. No. 13-03005 (S.D. Ga. Apr. F-nm r u q ^ rvr ro! rJcur!r.ryr W. Harrell is taken RFnnrf a"]d whlch reconrnends denial- of forma pauperis.' (Bankr, r]rIo^ .and einnad nn lv.il,6mh6r ?7 ^n1/1 . ir iq fhcrpF/1rF timal\/ 1 n^- Nl^ QA \ Thc :nna:l urifho'l- canti onad rraf f ey itc.nini.n :c oF be ranrriqira rha denied in fOrma Doc. No. 99. ) 3pa fiIinrr for dismissed CourL adopted the and (Bankr. sLatus ro Mr. Harre.Il. ne\/'r'enf must on December 9, 2014, this Fcr-nnneni'lar i ^n and pauperis f l^rs FirsL, two reasons. pFn^ri in ih'ic Thus, ^nr\o: l nrrst be dlsmissed. qannn.'l ^^ ^ ri ^+-i rrrnoc nf fodcral ^r ^^,,,1 rnno,al e frnm rhe intar'l^.irl-^r\r l -l - U . S . C . with orders R.enkrrrnf l-eave of fl^:f the encis the to court A flnal Ii-ioation do but as a1l (citation ^-A^r an Adams v. United f l^e d:re: nriqnn ^nfh-ri-iFs faLhef States, \mailhnv {"llnrler ic l-he 8002(c) (1) hUL nrienner F^. (effecLive 28 j-h.^ 1339, d:-p r-lol i rrare : ,r\. mrir;-^ nf court Fulton, for 111 Ihe Report and is not .r.lar. r ^ ' if h nal-il-inn nr nrhar e^^ ]lSO Fed. R. Dec. 1, 2074) . S is "one a f inal^n.l 1341. (11ti Cir. filinn n r v l rr lJ^ See qenerallv fn re appeals (2) U.S.C. and Ieaves nofhino inte.r-IO.r.j- .r\/ 113 E.3d rrrlF' na p s .r i S ' interfocutory in om-iLLed). Harrelf i.-..1^-a-- timo other judgment. " Recommendation from which Mr. ^v tha order in a bankruptcy its -irrdamanr. - . ,. * : . . . - . . . fin:l described on the meri!s 1 9 9 1) ll\ i On OVe.r three P. 8001(b) & 8003. execute E.3d 92, 93 (11'r' Cir. i UriSdiCt J radrr rir j - r u u u n r n |d (3) and 158(a) (3) and Eed. R. Bankr. 28 U.S.C. S 158(a). n! vr court, i rris,lir-tinn, in 28 U.S.C. S 158(a) (1); n !_L < fi r rc r o :u ri fnr n y r S 1121(d) ; hA:Js II .-r., r-^rrrl-. as described rnna:lc inrted COUTIS Of t h i c C o r r r lL- oI rt l] r u U ] and decrees, orders, under COUTtS aIe rha Mr. 1999) ,-.,rrrt filina ln Bankr. P. has not Harrell moljon .^rr-f uvul ma\/ "trF^f oifher crr .rrarf he '_lpnrr e.i fror -h^..! +l-r+ (2\ \-/ n! vf /- \ .\'/Fr ^..]Fr ic bankruptcy federaf r6v^6^r L^vryLrv.raf courts llnnn record and 8004(d) . P. and the appeal Notice r district *.. /-.\nl-r^l l r l r ln ig h ^ ^ round resorr Congress' ;^-^r / final r.ltry.r i ^h Harrel,f leave hr,r^u > L + r ' ^ oF I -aw reso_Lucion of Of the of the interlocutory Tnc. v. Lewis, 519 ( to S 1.292 b) requests would design ^-^^^ f he difference termination Caterpillar to h-.t-. Pdr Ly ^ , u^e .s L l o ^ r i n q, - affow Lhe which governs l ri ^r^ 9 for immadiat.e uses court's dPPcdl shoufd courts courc S 1292(b), f rnn :a' interlocucory ^isLrict advance the ultimate a firm cl e .on<i and denies Mr. Bankr. ]eave wherher feave to lV\\ j-ha sparingly. hardLy comport with ^,., f^r e /?\ U.S. 61, 14 11996) ("Routine -^,.i 12q) crrhcf ^nt ^n.l District appeals € : issue woufd materiallv litigation. 28 U.S.C. nraaanf ./^'rr.f q i.r.,nd in |ndar whi r-h l-hare nninrnr fof to granL discretionary r r . r - j -r . r - \ / a n n F a l s c J +l"u La^ \4/ a motion thc { h^ forth set r l norl unJ p u s r vvv! oF however, che district R. consider efrenfith whether r ' 1 i. r - - e l - i o n a - r z i n r F r l c ^" Fed. a hankr'-^F^ same standard .^l,rf r iI rhc on In decermining :nneals o anna:l a on December 3, 2014. of Appeaf fifed evyEqr n€ Even if fi-Le such appeal. noL f -iled, Court will this Accordingly, n.\1-i.o tha .lranj- qLo'rld to leave co appeal is for :LLq] L leave sought to reserve ^-allv gsrrs!u !r), inrerlocucory r e f u r arif n . i r d _ \ j r eL r r f.r !J! lL-_h e judgment rufe."). ' laa ^^.1rl- to ^-ercises _its discretion appeaf because he has not met rhe srandard for - hi s a- rearlv c.rr-t - L1r! v v.YrL.l r L ^ s1 it-s ^donfion appeaf be DISMISSED. pendlnq and aff affi y , Lw LJ rrecl -rrrrcr rha motions oct,Lory appeal. Renort Arnnrdinnlrr The Cl-erk is ORDERENTEREDac Qattua,L inLerf a discretionary and In fact, Recommendation I T I S O R D E R E DL h a t directed to CLOSE the case, are DENIED AS MOOT. Augusta, Georgia, Lhe this . UNITED STAT S D I S T R I C T J U

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?