Coleman et al v. Middle Georgia Probation LLC

Filing 28

ORDER STAYING CASE. The parties shall notify the Court at the resolution of the referenced appeal. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 11/12/15. (cmr)

ti ii iGiluA
L

i"ILED
U,S.8iSIftICT
COURT

THE UNTTED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
DUBI.IN DIVISION

IN

DfV.
,", ilJ;r,.;$TA

tf lS | 2 Att9:i3
NOV

RANDY EUGENE COLEMAN, STAR
other
LATOSHA YOUNG, and all
cimi

I:r'1r,'

<i

i -1 1 : i - o d

ACTION NO.

CIVIL

cv 3l-5-035
MIDDLE GEORGIA PROBATION LLC,
Defendant

.

ORDER

on April
to

action
ci.t-rrt-

-uqLuuv!1,

^r\/

to provide
ceorgia.

7, 20f5,

f^r.

probation

Middle

av.sr rrrru _i /l - \ r
y
l

Swainsboro,

,

action

Case No.

e

r)ri

lawsuits

r/^f

3:15-cv-30

staEe

f 6r-nrcrf

Probation
to

f ha

in

this

i I

r-.1mner'r i e<1

State

the

in

a private

LLc is

Court. of

^r*_1

M"_r

this

case have
district

companies on behalf

Judicial

the

of

over misdemeanor offenders

services
end

c

class

(compl-. u a a Exs. A & B.)

counsel- in

probation

see Keen v.

Gve o Y cq i,
e vt rr |

ceorgia.

Pl-ainuiffs'

r.)f

Georgia

company providing

!'m.anrral

private

rrqc

supervision

Defendant

probation

cl-ass

l- ha

putative

this

const ituE. ional i ty

the

chalfenge
e-hama

brought

Plaintiffs

Alternatives
(S.D.

Ga.

of
Mar.

brouqht

aqainst

2Q,

different
plaintiffs,

of different
Georqia,

simil-ar

Inc.

2015) ;

("JAG"),
Keffer

v.

Sentinel

Offender

Servs.,

May 2t,

201s) .

In

Keen case,

(S.D. Ga.

LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-60

zlicmicc

ie-l hua
r

s fu:q nvdr li: n o
ll r

infer

'

i q

nl:inl-

rrsed

f.l

if

r-crt- i frr

ncerj

nc)f

m.lj-ior

issues

proposes

in

t-hc

{See Keen v.

assefted

instant
-

(C.)mn^rc

2015,

21,
T
- {aan

case

-1^^^

Doc,

thefein

in

Eheir

the motion

No,

25

to

Keen

wiEh

Defense

any cl-ass action

Court not address

is resolved

in

the

to

aL 7.)
CourE grant.ed

this

rrnon

c--srrLtdffy

Doc. Nos. 19 and 38.)

L- -^r
JJc[JEl1

.-'d b c
^--

Lr:scd

':
rr.t

Pct.L L

LrPUrr

JAG, Case No. 3:l-5-cv-30,

motion
DLarrurrry.

That

Doc. No. 49.)

now on appeal.

case is
HarA

l-ha

Meanwhil-e,
days its

m.rl- i.rn

Defendant

i-^

has

wishes to await

both

parties

awaiE the resol-uEion
ORDERS
that. this

f il-ed

i f1/

r'l:qq

a motion

resol-ution

rem:inq

to

nendinrr

ext.end by

sixty

requesEs upon Pfaintiffs.
of the appeal- in the Keen

do not oppose the motion.

Plaintiffs
Because

r'arf

Eo serve discovery

deadfine

Defendant
case.

arorrr'rent

the

(Doc. No. 25-L,

On August
ac

2O1q

such time as the motsion Eo dismiss

unt.il

the Keen case.

emi

this

that

?A

lu-v. ) . e r jt - i f rurr l j
vu

rear-hed

tte

l

do not have standing,

JAG, Case No. 3:15-cv-30,

counsel

in

JAG moved to

Defendant

Anri

stendinc'

Pl-aintiffs

that

.1n

counsel-

DlFirfiffq'

arguing

di

.aqa

ThF

a1ia.

l.rw defense

lepyvrrru

v.

f /q

if

t/+g+rre+

the

have

of the appeal

indicat.ed

a

willingness

in the Keen case,

t.o

the Court

case is hereby STAYED. The Cl-erk is directed

to

TERMINATE Lhe motion

h.rt

e

Ps!

i ae
+ev

raFarannod

a]-'r1

1

rnna:

n.\1- i f \r

to
t-hF

extend
r.^lrrt-

time
nf

l- ha

(doc.

no.

resolution

26).
of

The
the

l

ORDERENTEREDat

Augusta,

Georgia,

tni= /21^v

November, 2015.

DISTRICT.]UDGE

or