Deere & Company v. Rebel Auction Company, Inc. et al

Filing 39

ORDER directing the Clerk to enter a judgment in favor of Plaintiff in the amount of $109,922.43 plus interest accruing thereon; granting 37 Motion For Issuance of Execution. The Clerk is directed to enter a Writ of Execution forthwith against Defendants Rebel Auction Company, Inc. and Four-D, Inc., both Georgia corporations, in the amount of $24,444.78 plus interest accruing from September 27, 2016. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 11/22/2016. (thb)

Download PDF
Li r.! G IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION DEERE Sc COMPANY, * * Plaintiff, * * V. * CV 315-072 * REBEL AUCTION COMPANY, INC., and FOUR-D, INC., * * * Defendants. * ORDER On August 8, 2016, this Court entered Order/Judgment" in the captioned matter.^ a "Consent (Doc. No. 31.) Pursuant to the Consent Order/Judgment, Plaintiff was awarded compensatory damages totaling $71,479.00, plus interest on said amount from the date of conversion, March 15, 2014, to July 27, 2016, at the rate of 7% per annum, which totaled $11,858.00. The Consent Order/Judgment also awarded interest at a rate of $13.71 per annum, which was effective from July 28, 2016 to Order/Judgment August 4, 2016.^ awarded $21,769.00 $1,490.48 in costs. Finally, the Consent in attorney's fees and On October 11, 2016, the Court awarded an additional $2,999.50 in attorney's fees, as contemplated by ^ The Court entered this document titled "Consent Order/Judgment" as an accommodation to the parties who drafted it. It is more akin to a settlement agreement that should have been accompanied by the Clerk's entry of Judgment in favor of Plaintiff. This Order will perfect the record in that regard. ^ The rate of interest from August 5, 2016 has been and continues to be $4,09 per annum. (See Aff. in Supp. of the Issuance of an Execution, Doc. No. 34, ^ 3.)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?