Maryland Casualty Company et al v. Dublin Eye Associates, P.C. et al

Filing 16

ORDER directing the Plaintiffs to file a new amended complaint within 7 days of this order, (Amended Pleadings due by 2/16/2016). Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 2/9/16. (cmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY and FOREMOST SIGNATURE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiffs, v. DUBLIN EYE ASSOCIATES, P.C.; DR. ROGER D. SMITH; and DR. JAMES Y. JONES, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV 315-081 _________ ORDER _________ Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Plaintiffs have obtained consent to amend the complaint from the only Defendant to have made an appearance in this case, Dr. James Y. Jones. (Doc. no. 14.) Plaintiffs filed a document styled “Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment,” in which they attempt to incorporate by reference all allegations of the original complaint except for a new paragraph three. (Doc. no. 15.) However, in the Eleventh Circuit, an amended complaint supersedes and replaces in its entirety the previous pleading filed by Plaintiffs. See Hoefling v. City of Miami, -F.3d-, No. 14-12482, 2016 WL 285358, at *4 (11th Cir. 2016); Krinsk v. SunTrust Banks, Inc., 654 F.3d 1194, 1202 (11th Cir. 2011). In accordance with this principle, Plaintiffs shall file, within seven days of the date of this Order, a complete amended complaint as a stand-alone entry on the docket rather than rely on a piecemeal, one-paragraph substitution. SO ORDERED this 9th day of February, 2016, at Augusta, Georgia. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?