Inman v. Zanders et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING 18 Report and Recommendations, DENYING AS MOOT 13 Motion for Screening, and DISMISSING Plaintiff's legal mail, access to the courts, and retaliatory transfer claims against Defendants Zanders and Sanders, and all claims against Defendants Homer Bryson and Department of Corrections. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 11/28/2016. (maa)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTy 3 Dis^^cFcOURT "aUG'JST^ GiV. FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Zfllb NOV 28 P U: 50 DUBLIN DIVISION A CLERK KENNETH L. INMAN, y mlMT. GA. Plaintiff, V. SAM ZANDERS, Warden, Dodge State Prison; TINA SANDERS, Deputy Warden of Care & Treatment, Dodge Slate Prison; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; and HOMER BRYSON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. CV 315-095 ") ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), to which objections have been filed. (Doc. no. 21.) The Magistrate Judge recommended dismissal of Plaintiffs legal mail, access to the courts, and retaliatory transfer claims against Defendants Zanders and Sanders, and all claims against Defendants Homer Bryson and Department of Corrections.' (See doc. no. 18.) Nothing in Plaintiffs objections undermines the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, and only one objection warrants further comment. ' The portion of the October 28th Report and Recommendation's conclusion section which stated Plaintiffs equal protection claims should be dismissed was a scrivener's error (doc. no. 18, p. 8) and did not reflect the substance of the Magistrate Judge's analysis that Plaintiff had a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of his equal protection claims regarding more favorable treatment to Hispanic inmates in the celebration of Cinco de Mayo against Defendants Zanders and Sanders (doc. no. 17, pp. 1-2).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?