Edwards v. Hynes et al

Filing 47

ORDER ADOPTING 16 Report and Recommendations and DISMISSING Plaintiff's claims of deliberate indifference to his ingrown toenail and need for vitamins, Boost, and ibuprofen, all supervisory liability claims against Defendant Clark, and all claims of retaliatory transfer against Defendants Hynes, Hun, and Cottle. The Court further DISMISSES Defendant Hynes from the case, as no claims against him remain. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 01/18/2017. (maa)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT '^ •- - V' > .S !i f. FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2011 JAN 18 A io DUBLIN DIVISION CL£RI(, CHARLES EDWARDS, sOisiGfir"" Plaintiff, CV316-019 V. DR. ANDREW HYNES; MEDICAL DIRECTOR PAT CLARK, Wheeler Correctional Facility; MS. COTTLE,Dental Assistant, Wheeler Correctional Facility; and DR. HUN, Dentist, Defendants. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), to which objections have been filed. (Doc. no. 44.) Plaintiff does not offer any new information, evidence, or argument that warrants a deviation from the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion and DISMISSES Plaintiffs claims of deliberate indifference to his ingrown toenail and need for vitamins, Boost, and ibuprofen, all supervisory liability claims against Defendant Clark, and all claims of retaliatory transfer against Defendants Hynes, Hun, and Cottle. The Court further DISMISSES Defendant Hynes from the case, as no claims against him remain. SO ORDERED this ay of January, 2017, at Augusta, Georgia. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?