Davidson v. Emmins et al

Filing 15

ORDER directing the Clerk to dismiss CV316-028 and this case will proceed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 6/8/16. (cmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION GERALD DAVIDSON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. WARDEN S. EMMINS, et al., _ _ Defendants. _ _ _ GERALD A. DAVIDSON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN S. EMMINS, et al., Defendants. CV 316-025 _ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) _________ CV 316-028 ORDER _________ On March 24, 2016, Plaintiff submitted a complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Northern District of Georgia. Davidson v. Emmins, CV 316-025, doc. no. 1 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 31, 2016). Fourteen days later, on April 7, 2016, Plaintiff submitted another complaint brought pursuant to § 1983 in the Northern District of Georgia. Davidson v. Emmins, CV 316-028, doc. no. 1 (S.D. Ga. Apr. 14, 2016). Both cases were transferred from the Northern District of Georgia to the Southern District of Georgia because both of Plaintiff’s complaints concern events that occurred at Johnson State Prison. CV 316-025, doc. no. 3; CV 316-028, doc. no. 3. On May 19, 2016, the Court directed Plaintiff to notify the court whether he intended to open CV 316-028 as a separate case or if he merely intended to file an amended complaint in CV 316-025. (Doc. no. 6.) On May 30, 2016, Plaintiff responded that his intention was to combine CV 316-025 with CV 316-028, with CV 316-028 serving as an amendment to CV 316-025. (Doc. no. 7, p. 1.) In light of this information, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to DISMISS Davidson v. Emmins, CV 316-028 without prejudice and terminate all pending motions. Additionally, Davidson v. Emmins, CV 316-025 will proceed and the Court DIRECTS the CLERK to re-docket in that case as an amended complaint the complaint Plaintiff filed in Davidson v. Emmins, CV 316-028, doc. no. 1. SO ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2016, at Augusta, Georgia. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?