Glenn v. O'Neal et al

Filing 39

ORDER ADOPTING 31 Report and Recommendations, DISMISSING certain claims, DISMISSING Defendants Emmons, Baker, O'Neal, James Doe Deputy Warden of Security, James Doe in charge of security, JSP Medical Provider, John Doe JSP Medical Director, J efferson, Andrews-Bodi, Nurse Brian Doe, Deal, and Bryson from this case. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to TERMINATE the Georgia Department of Corrections from the docket as it is not named as a party in Plaintiff's amended complaint. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 04/11/2017. (maa)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION KENNETH MARTIN GLENN, Plaintiff, CV 316-029 V. MRS,K. WILLIAMS, Chief Counselor; MRS. WICKER HUMPHRIES, Counselor; SHAWN EMMONS, Warden; MRS.PRICE, Deputy Warden; MRS. BAKER, Counselor (Administration); JEFFREY WIGGINS, Sergeant; MR. O'NEAL,Unit Manager; GOVERNOR NATHAN DEAL; HOMER BRYSON,Commissioner GDC;JAMES DOE,JSP Deputy Warden Security; JAMES DOE,Person in Charge of Security at Johnson Prison; MRS.PERRY, Mental Health Counselor; JOHNSON STATE PRISON'S MEDICAL PROVIDER; JOHN DOE,JSP Medical Director; MR. JEFFERSON,Deputy Warden; MRS. ANDREWS/BODI,NA/PA; BRIAN DOE, Nurse; JOHNSON STATE PRISON'S PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT PROVIDER; and JOHN OR JANE DOE,Johnson State Prison's Psychiatric Provider, Defendants. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed, despite the Court granting an extension of time to file objections (doc. no. 36). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion and DISMISSES Plaintiffs claims for (1) denial of due process by denying his grievances against Defendants Williams, Wicker-Humphries, Emmons, Price, and Baker;(2) terroristic threats against Defendant O'Neal;(3) ordering gang members to assault him and inject him with staph infection against Defendant O'Neal;(4) Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to his safety against Defendants Williams, Emmons, Price, O'Neal, and Jefferson;(5) Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to his back injury, wrists and hands injury, hemorrhoids, and staph infection against Defendants Price, JSP Medical Provider, John Doe JSP Medical Director, Jefferson, Andrews-Bodi, and Nurse Brian Doe; (6) failure to enforce prison cell phone regulations against Defendants James Doe Deputy Warden of Security and James Doe person in charge of security; (7) supervisory liability claims against Defendant Price; and (8) all claims against Defendants Nathan Deal and Homer Bryson. As no claims remain against them, the Court DISMISSES Defendants Emmons, Baker, O'Neal, James Doe Deputy Warden of Security, James Doe in charge of security, JSP Medical Provider, John Doe JSP Medical Director, Jefferson, Andrews-Bodi, Nurse Brian Doe, Deal, and Bryson from this case. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to TERMINATE the Georgia Department of Corrections from the docket as it is not named as a party in Plaintiffs amended complaint(doc. no. 27). As explained in the Magistrate Judge's February 15, 2017 Order, the case shall proceed on Plaintiffs (1) First Amendment claims for retaliatory punishment for filing grievances against Defendants Williams and Wicker-Humphries; (2) excessive force claims against Defendant Wiggins; and (3) Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to psychiatric needs claims against Defendants Perry, Price, JSP Psychiatric Provider, and Director of JSP 2 Psychiatric Provider. (See doc. no. 33.) The Court reminds PlaintifiF that he is responsible for service, and the deadline for service is May 16, 2017. (See id. at 8.) As Plaintiff has been warned, "[F]ailure to [serve Defendants] may result in their dismissal from this lawsuit or dismissal ofthis case." (Id.(citingFed. R. Civ. P. 4(m)).) SO ORDERED this //^ day of April, 2017, at Augusta, Georgia. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?