Farrow v. Morales et al
ORDER ADOPTING 3 Report and Recommendations, DISMISSING this 2254 case without prejudice, DENYING a COA in this case and CLOSING this civil action. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 04/11/2017. (maa)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly,
the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion,
and DISMISSES this case filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 without prejudice.
A prisoner seeking relief under § 2254 must obtain a certificate of appealability
("COA") before appealing the denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. This
Court "must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to
the applicant." Rule 11(a) to the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings. This Court
should grant a COA only if the prisoner makes a "substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). For the reasons set forth in the Report and
Recommendation, and in consideration of the standards enunciated in Slack v. McDanieL
529 U.S. 473, 482-84 (2000), Petitioner has failed to make the requisite showing.
Accordingly, the Court DENIES a COA in this case.^ Moreover, because there are no nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and Petitioner
is not entitled to appeal informa pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
Upon the foregoing, the Court CLOSES this civil action.
SO ORDERED this // day of April, 2017, at Augusta, Georgia.
'"If the court denies a certificate, the parties may not appeal the denial but may seek a
certificate from the court of appeals under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22." Rule 11(a)
to the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?