Sullivan v. Core Civic et al

Filing 48

ORDER denying 41 Motion for Reconsideration re 39 Order on Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 05/11/2018. (jlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
DUBLIN DIVISION
MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
GLYNN POWELL,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
_________

CV 317-017

ORDER
_________
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Averment of Constructive and Actual Fraud upon the
Court by Consummation, Misrepresentation, and Suppression of Facts.” (Doc. no. 41.) In
his motion, Plaintiff argues defense counsel has engaged in fraudulent and evasive behavior
and asks the Court reconsider its March 19, 2018 granting in part his Motion to Compel and
“GRANT his discovery request exactly as is worded in No. 5 of the Request for Production
of Documents.” (Id. at 7.) As this Court previously held, Plaintiff’s Request for Production
No. 5 “is overly broad because it seeks information regarding WCF and Warden Vance
Laughlin, who are not parties to this action, and it seeks information concerning any
complaint against Defendant.”

(Doc. no. 39, p. 4.)

Accordingly, the Court DENIES

Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration of its March 19th Order. (Doc. no. 41.)
SO ORDERED this 11th day of May, 2018, at Augusta, Georgia.

2