Clark v. Sheffield et al
ORDER for Defendants Sheffield and Barrentine to file substantive responses to Plaintiff's 32 MOTION to Compel and attach their relevant interrogatory and request responses within 7 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 03/07/2018. (jlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ARTHUR LAWTON CLARK,
LYNN SHEFFIELD, Sheriff; LT. TOMMY )
BARRENTINE; and DR. PETER WROBEL, )
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel.
(Doc. no. 32.)
Defendants correctly state Plaintiff’s motion does not comply with Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 37 or Local Rule 26.5, for the sake of judicial efficiency, the Court will address
Plaintiff’s claims on the merits. Defendant Wrobel has filed a substantive response and
attached his relevant interrogatory and request responses.
(Doc. no. 37.)
Defendants Sheffield and Barrentine have not. (Doc. no. 35.) Accordingly, the Court
ORDERS Defendants Sheffield and Barrentine to file a substantive response and to attach
their relevant interrogatory and request responses within seven days of this Order.
SO ORDERED this 7th day of March, 2018, at Augusta, Georgia.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?