Barnes v. Beasley et al
ORDER directing service of 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 07/17/2017. (thb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
J. BEASLEY, Lieutenant; PHILIP HALL,
Warden, Telfair State Prison; FRED
GAMMAGE, Deputy Warden/Security;
CATHY LEWIS, Deputy Warden /
Care & Treatment; NANCY M. HARRIS
MRS./MS. JOHNSON, Grievance
Coordinator; BARBARA GRANT, Unit
Manager; GREGORY C. DOZIER,
Commissioner of GDC; ROBERT
TOOLE, Field Operations Manager; and,
STANLEY WILLIAMS, Warden, Valdosta
Let a copy of this Report and Recommendation be served upon counsel for the
parties. Any party who objects to this Report and Recommendation or anything in it must
file, not later than August 3, 2017, written objections specifically identifying the portions of
the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection is made and the specific basis
for objection.1 The Clerk will submit this Report and Recommendation together with any
objections to United States District Judge Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., on August 4, 2017. Failure
A copy of the objections must be served upon all other parties to the action.
to file specific objections within the specified time means that this Report and
Recommendation may become the opinion and order of the Court, Devine v. Prison Health
Servs., Inc., 212 F. App’x 890, 892 (11th Cir. 2006), and may limit a party’s appellate rights.
Dupree v. Warden, 715 F.3d 1295, 1300 (11th Cir. 2013).
Requests for extension of time to file objections to this Report and Recommendation
shall be directed to Judge Bowen.
A party may not appeal a Magistrate Judge’s recommendation directly to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Appeals may be made only from a final
judgment entered by the District Judge.
SO ORDERED this 17th day of July, 2017, at Augusta, Georgia.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?